从《福国京平》到《福国强兵》:中国与日本帝国的比较分析

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

Comparative Legal History Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238

David K. C. Huang, Nigel N. T. Li

{"title":"从《福国京平》到《福国强兵》:中国与日本帝国的比较分析","authors":"David K. C. Huang, Nigel N. T. Li","doi":"10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan’s Meiji Restoration was a modernisation reform Imperial China aimed to transplant. However, China failed in applying Japan’s (Meiji) constitutionalism of Fukoku Kyohei and the institution thereof. This article examines the then social-political grounds of both China and Japan through a comparative approach to explore why China floundered whilst Japan succeeded from the perspective of institutes of constitution. The conclusion of this article is that the differences between China and Japan were underestimated, that the Imperial Court of China neglected the difficulties of the transplantation because they saw only the fruits of Fukoku Kyohei (Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing).","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"8 1","pages":"27 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Fukoku Kyohei to Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing: a comparative analysis of Imperial China and Japan\",\"authors\":\"David K. C. Huang, Nigel N. T. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Japan’s Meiji Restoration was a modernisation reform Imperial China aimed to transplant. However, China failed in applying Japan’s (Meiji) constitutionalism of Fukoku Kyohei and the institution thereof. This article examines the then social-political grounds of both China and Japan through a comparative approach to explore why China floundered whilst Japan succeeded from the perspective of institutes of constitution. The conclusion of this article is that the differences between China and Japan were underestimated, that the Imperial Court of China neglected the difficulties of the transplantation because they saw only the fruits of Fukoku Kyohei (Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing).\",\"PeriodicalId\":53815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1768238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

日本的明治维新是中国帝国旨在移植的现代化改革。但是，中国在运用日本（明治）立宪制及其制度方面却失败了。本文通过比较的方法考察了中日两国当时的社会政治基础，并从宪法制度的角度探讨了中日之间的困境与成功。本文的结论是，中日之间的差异被低估了，中国朝廷忽视了移植的困难，因为他们只看到了福国强兵的果实。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From Fukoku Kyohei to Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing: a comparative analysis of Imperial China and Japan

Japan’s Meiji Restoration was a modernisation reform Imperial China aimed to transplant. However, China failed in applying Japan’s (Meiji) constitutionalism of Fukoku Kyohei and the institution thereof. This article examines the then social-political grounds of both China and Japan through a comparative approach to explore why China floundered whilst Japan succeeded from the perspective of institutes of constitution. The conclusion of this article is that the differences between China and Japan were underestimated, that the Imperial Court of China neglected the difficulties of the transplantation because they saw only the fruits of Fukoku Kyohei (Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Comparative Legal History LAW-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.