粮食生产在开放空间规划中的作用:哥本哈根和布鲁塞尔城乡边缘的战后规划

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
J. Waegemaeker, J. Primdahl, Elke Vanempten, L. Kristensen, E. Rogge, H. Vejre
{"title":"粮食生产在开放空间规划中的作用:哥本哈根和布鲁塞尔城乡边缘的战后规划","authors":"J. Waegemaeker, J. Primdahl, Elke Vanempten, L. Kristensen, E. Rogge, H. Vejre","doi":"10.1080/09654313.2023.2212021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following the renewed attention for food production near cities, multiple concepts propose the creation of spaces for food production at the rural–urban fringe (RUF). The RUF is an area of multiple policy domains and, as a consequence, those new concepts are confronted with complexity when put into practice. Local planning history is part of the complexity as it casts shadows on contemporary planning debate and practice. This paper explores how past policies at the RUF impact the current and future policy work on spaces for local food production via comparative study of the post-war planning histories of the RUF’s in Copenhagen and Brussels. The paper addresses both policies within the urban realm, e.g. the planning of urban open spaces at the border of the city, and policies within the rural realm, e.g. the land-use rights in agricultural land and land consolidation projects. The comparative study identifies some key challenges with regards to the supply of space for local food production at the RUF in Copenhagen and the RUF in Brussels. Moreover, the paper stresses that a thorough understanding of the planning history is a prerequisite for effective food planning near the city to avoid repeating errors of the past.","PeriodicalId":48292,"journal":{"name":"European Planning Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"2235 - 2253"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of food production in planning for open space: post-war planning of the rural–urban fringes of Copenhagen and Brussels\",\"authors\":\"J. Waegemaeker, J. Primdahl, Elke Vanempten, L. Kristensen, E. Rogge, H. Vejre\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09654313.2023.2212021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Following the renewed attention for food production near cities, multiple concepts propose the creation of spaces for food production at the rural–urban fringe (RUF). The RUF is an area of multiple policy domains and, as a consequence, those new concepts are confronted with complexity when put into practice. Local planning history is part of the complexity as it casts shadows on contemporary planning debate and practice. This paper explores how past policies at the RUF impact the current and future policy work on spaces for local food production via comparative study of the post-war planning histories of the RUF’s in Copenhagen and Brussels. The paper addresses both policies within the urban realm, e.g. the planning of urban open spaces at the border of the city, and policies within the rural realm, e.g. the land-use rights in agricultural land and land consolidation projects. The comparative study identifies some key challenges with regards to the supply of space for local food production at the RUF in Copenhagen and the RUF in Brussels. Moreover, the paper stresses that a thorough understanding of the planning history is a prerequisite for effective food planning near the city to avoid repeating errors of the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"2235 - 2253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2212021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2212021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要随着人们对城市附近粮食生产的重新关注,多种概念提出了在城乡边缘创造粮食生产空间的建议。联阵是一个涉及多个政策领域的地区,因此,这些新概念在付诸实践时面临着复杂性。地方规划历史是复杂性的一部分,因为它给当代规划辩论和实践蒙上了阴影。本文通过对联阵在哥本哈根和布鲁塞尔的战后规划历史的比较研究,探讨了联阵过去的政策如何影响当前和未来关于当地粮食生产空间的政策工作。该文件涉及城市领域的政策,例如城市边界城市开放空间的规划,以及农村领域的政策(例如农业土地使用权和土地整理项目)。比较研究确定了在哥本哈根联阵和布鲁塞尔联阵为当地粮食生产提供空间方面的一些关键挑战。此外,本文强调,深入了解规划历史是有效规划城市附近食品的先决条件,以避免重蹈覆辙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of food production in planning for open space: post-war planning of the rural–urban fringes of Copenhagen and Brussels
ABSTRACT Following the renewed attention for food production near cities, multiple concepts propose the creation of spaces for food production at the rural–urban fringe (RUF). The RUF is an area of multiple policy domains and, as a consequence, those new concepts are confronted with complexity when put into practice. Local planning history is part of the complexity as it casts shadows on contemporary planning debate and practice. This paper explores how past policies at the RUF impact the current and future policy work on spaces for local food production via comparative study of the post-war planning histories of the RUF’s in Copenhagen and Brussels. The paper addresses both policies within the urban realm, e.g. the planning of urban open spaces at the border of the city, and policies within the rural realm, e.g. the land-use rights in agricultural land and land consolidation projects. The comparative study identifies some key challenges with regards to the supply of space for local food production at the RUF in Copenhagen and the RUF in Brussels. Moreover, the paper stresses that a thorough understanding of the planning history is a prerequisite for effective food planning near the city to avoid repeating errors of the past.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: European Planning Studies provides a forum for ideas and information about spatial development processes and policies in Europe. The journal publishes articles of a theoretical, empirical and policy-relevant nature and is particularly concerned to integrate knowledge of processes with practical policy proposals, implementation and evaluation. Articles of particular interest to the journal focus upon specific spatial development problems, as well as emerging explanations of new urban, regional, national or supranational developmental tendencies. Country-specific, region-specific or locality-specific issues are focused upon, although comparative analysis is of especial value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信