反和平:从和平进程中的孤立障碍到系统模式

IF 3.2 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Review of International Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.1017/S0260210522000377

Sandra Pogodda, Oliver P. Richmond, Gëzim Visoka

{"title":"反和平:从和平进程中的孤立障碍到系统模式","authors":"Sandra Pogodda, Oliver P. Richmond, Gëzim Visoka","doi":"10.1017/S0260210522000377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the face of the current decline or spectacular collapse of peace processes, this article investigates whether peace has become systematically blocked. It investigates whether the ineffectiveness of an ‘international peace architecture’ (IPA) can be explained by a more potent counterpeace system, which is growing in its shadow. It identifies counterpeace as proto-systemic processes that connect spoilers across all scales (local, regional, national, transnational), while exploiting structural blockages to peace and unintended consequences of peace interventions. It elaborates three distinct patterns of blockages to peace in contemporary conflicts across the globe: the stalemate, limited counterpeace, and unmitigated counterpeace. Drawing on the counterrevolution literature, this research asks: Have peace interventions become the source of their own undoing? Which factors consolidate or aggravate emerging conflict patterns? Are blockages to peace systemic enough to construct a sedimentary and layered counterpeace edifice?","PeriodicalId":48017,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"491 - 512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counter-peace: From isolated blockages in peace processes to systemic patterns\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Pogodda, Oliver P. Richmond, Gëzim Visoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0260210522000377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the face of the current decline or spectacular collapse of peace processes, this article investigates whether peace has become systematically blocked. It investigates whether the ineffectiveness of an ‘international peace architecture’ (IPA) can be explained by a more potent counterpeace system, which is growing in its shadow. It identifies counterpeace as proto-systemic processes that connect spoilers across all scales (local, regional, national, transnational), while exploiting structural blockages to peace and unintended consequences of peace interventions. It elaborates three distinct patterns of blockages to peace in contemporary conflicts across the globe: the stalemate, limited counterpeace, and unmitigated counterpeace. Drawing on the counterrevolution literature, this research asks: Have peace interventions become the source of their own undoing? Which factors consolidate or aggravate emerging conflict patterns? Are blockages to peace systemic enough to construct a sedimentary and layered counterpeace edifice?\",\"PeriodicalId\":48017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of International Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"491 - 512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of International Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000377\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000377","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要面对当前和平进程的衰落或惊人的崩溃，本文调查了和平是否已经系统性地受阻。它调查了“国际和平架构”（IPA）的无效性是否可以用一个在其阴影下成长的更强大的反和平体系来解释。它将反和平确定为将所有规模（地方、区域、国家、跨国）的破坏者联系起来的原始系统性进程，同时利用和平的结构性障碍和和平干预的意外后果。它阐述了当代全球冲突中阻碍和平的三种不同模式：僵局、有限的反反应和不缓和的反反应。根据反革命文献，这项研究问道：和平干预是否成为其自身毁灭的根源？哪些因素巩固或加剧了新出现的冲突模式？和平的障碍是否足够系统，足以建造一座沉积的、分层的反和平大厦？

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Counter-peace: From isolated blockages in peace processes to systemic patterns

Abstract In the face of the current decline or spectacular collapse of peace processes, this article investigates whether peace has become systematically blocked. It investigates whether the ineffectiveness of an ‘international peace architecture’ (IPA) can be explained by a more potent counterpeace system, which is growing in its shadow. It identifies counterpeace as proto-systemic processes that connect spoilers across all scales (local, regional, national, transnational), while exploiting structural blockages to peace and unintended consequences of peace interventions. It elaborates three distinct patterns of blockages to peace in contemporary conflicts across the globe: the stalemate, limited counterpeace, and unmitigated counterpeace. Drawing on the counterrevolution literature, this research asks: Have peace interventions become the source of their own undoing? Which factors consolidate or aggravate emerging conflict patterns? Are blockages to peace systemic enough to construct a sedimentary and layered counterpeace edifice?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Review of International Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

3.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Review of International Studies serves the needs of scholars in international relations and related fields such as politics, history, law, and sociology. The Review publishes a significant number of high quality research articles, review articles which survey new contributions to the field, a forum section to accommodate debates and replies, and occasional interviews with leading scholars.