美国史学界纳特纳起义的原因与前提

A. A. Shumakov
{"title":"美国史学界纳特纳起义的原因与前提","authors":"A. A. Shumakov","doi":"10.22281/2413-9912-2022-06-02-154-163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work the author analyzes the causes and prerequisites of the Southampton slave uprising of 1831 based on the materials of journalistic articles and reports of the XIX century and academic works of the XX-XXI centuries. At the same time, the main emphasis is on considering the dynamics of changes in the interpretation and perception of this event in American historiography. Such an unusual choice of subject is dictated by the fact that it is this question, according to the author, that is decisive in the study of this phenomenon, because it leads to the essential characteristics of the phenomenon under consideration. The author identifies two sets of causes and prerequisites – objective and subjective, describing each of them in detail. In addition, he identifies three key stages in the history of the study of the Nat Turner uprising: 1831-1900 – the first attempts at analysis in the form of journalistic reports, 1900-1971 – the formation of a binary academic perception associated with the release of works by W. Drewry and H. Apteker, 1971-our time – attempts to synthesize two approaches. It is noteworthy that the latter did not lead to the creation of a new concept. As the main method, materialistic dialectics is used, which allows us to consider this phenomenon in dynamics and in accordance with the principle of historicism, as a specific historical method, retrospective analysis is used, which is best suited for establishing and characterizing cause-and-effect relationships.","PeriodicalId":34506,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CAUSES AND PREREQUISITES OF THE NAT TURNER UPRISING IN AMERICAN HISTORIOGRAPHY\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Shumakov\",\"doi\":\"10.22281/2413-9912-2022-06-02-154-163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work the author analyzes the causes and prerequisites of the Southampton slave uprising of 1831 based on the materials of journalistic articles and reports of the XIX century and academic works of the XX-XXI centuries. At the same time, the main emphasis is on considering the dynamics of changes in the interpretation and perception of this event in American historiography. Such an unusual choice of subject is dictated by the fact that it is this question, according to the author, that is decisive in the study of this phenomenon, because it leads to the essential characteristics of the phenomenon under consideration. The author identifies two sets of causes and prerequisites – objective and subjective, describing each of them in detail. In addition, he identifies three key stages in the history of the study of the Nat Turner uprising: 1831-1900 – the first attempts at analysis in the form of journalistic reports, 1900-1971 – the formation of a binary academic perception associated with the release of works by W. Drewry and H. Apteker, 1971-our time – attempts to synthesize two approaches. It is noteworthy that the latter did not lead to the creation of a new concept. As the main method, materialistic dialectics is used, which allows us to consider this phenomenon in dynamics and in accordance with the principle of historicism, as a specific historical method, retrospective analysis is used, which is best suited for establishing and characterizing cause-and-effect relationships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22281/2413-9912-2022-06-02-154-163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22281/2413-9912-2022-06-02-154-163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以十九世纪的新闻报道和二十至十一世纪的学术著作为材料,分析了1831年南安普顿奴隶起义的原因和前提。同时,主要重点是考虑美国史学对这一事件的解释和感知的变化动态。根据作者的说法,正是这个问题决定了对这一现象的研究,因为它导致了所考虑的现象的本质特征。作者确定了两组原因和先决条件——客观和主观,并详细描述了每一组。此外,他确定了纳特·特纳起义研究史上的三个关键阶段:1831-1900年——第一次尝试以新闻报道的形式进行分析,1900-1971年——与W.Drewry和H.Apteker的作品发布相关的二元学术认知的形成,1971年我们这个时代——试图综合两种方法。值得注意的是,后者并没有导致一个新概念的产生。作为主要的方法,使用了唯物辩证法,这使我们能够从动力学上考虑这一现象,并根据历史主义的原则,作为一种特定的历史方法,使用回顾性分析,这最适合于建立和表征因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE CAUSES AND PREREQUISITES OF THE NAT TURNER UPRISING IN AMERICAN HISTORIOGRAPHY
In this work the author analyzes the causes and prerequisites of the Southampton slave uprising of 1831 based on the materials of journalistic articles and reports of the XIX century and academic works of the XX-XXI centuries. At the same time, the main emphasis is on considering the dynamics of changes in the interpretation and perception of this event in American historiography. Such an unusual choice of subject is dictated by the fact that it is this question, according to the author, that is decisive in the study of this phenomenon, because it leads to the essential characteristics of the phenomenon under consideration. The author identifies two sets of causes and prerequisites – objective and subjective, describing each of them in detail. In addition, he identifies three key stages in the history of the study of the Nat Turner uprising: 1831-1900 – the first attempts at analysis in the form of journalistic reports, 1900-1971 – the formation of a binary academic perception associated with the release of works by W. Drewry and H. Apteker, 1971-our time – attempts to synthesize two approaches. It is noteworthy that the latter did not lead to the creation of a new concept. As the main method, materialistic dialectics is used, which allows us to consider this phenomenon in dynamics and in accordance with the principle of historicism, as a specific historical method, retrospective analysis is used, which is best suited for establishing and characterizing cause-and-effect relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信