(再)《儿童和青少年法》颁布三十年后,巴西发现收养

Runa Pub Date : 2019-11-20 DOI:10.34096/runa.v40i2.7110
Claudia Fonseca
{"title":"(再)《儿童和青少年法》颁布三十年后,巴西发现收养","authors":"Claudia Fonseca","doi":"10.34096/runa.v40i2.7110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on documental sources and informal interviews with professionals involved in this theme, we propose in this article to describe changes in the field of child adoption in Brazil over the past thirty years. We begin with a methodological observation on the lack of systematic statistics on domestic adoption. We proceed to consider a growing emphasis in recent years on adoption through the National Adoption Registry (in particular of older children) as a solution for the large number of youngsters in institutional care. We suggest that a pragmatic view based on the individualized child’s rights has gained ground, at the same time that discourses on “social justice” and “family reintegration”, associated with the beginning years of the Children’s Code, have been toned down. We then turn to the debates around “direct adoptions”, raising the hypothesis that, although suffering from doubtful legitimacy and zero visibility in official discourse, they exert a great influence on adoption practice in Brazil. We finish by underlining silences in the field of child adoption that hinder the evaluation of present policies as well as the planning of effective policies in the future.","PeriodicalId":30160,"journal":{"name":"Runa","volume":"40 1","pages":"17-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Re)descobrindo a adoção no Brasil trinta anos depois do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Fonseca\",\"doi\":\"10.34096/runa.v40i2.7110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on documental sources and informal interviews with professionals involved in this theme, we propose in this article to describe changes in the field of child adoption in Brazil over the past thirty years. We begin with a methodological observation on the lack of systematic statistics on domestic adoption. We proceed to consider a growing emphasis in recent years on adoption through the National Adoption Registry (in particular of older children) as a solution for the large number of youngsters in institutional care. We suggest that a pragmatic view based on the individualized child’s rights has gained ground, at the same time that discourses on “social justice” and “family reintegration”, associated with the beginning years of the Children’s Code, have been toned down. We then turn to the debates around “direct adoptions”, raising the hypothesis that, although suffering from doubtful legitimacy and zero visibility in official discourse, they exert a great influence on adoption practice in Brazil. We finish by underlining silences in the field of child adoption that hinder the evaluation of present policies as well as the planning of effective policies in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Runa\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"17-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Runa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34096/runa.v40i2.7110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Runa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/runa.v40i2.7110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

基于文献来源和对参与这一主题的专业人士的非正式采访,我们在本文中建议描述过去三十年来巴西儿童收养领域的变化。我们首先从方法上观察到,国内收养缺乏系统的统计数据。我们着手考虑,近年来越来越重视通过国家收养登记处进行收养(尤其是年龄较大的儿童),以解决机构中大量青少年的问题。我们认为,一种基于个性化儿童权利的务实观点已经深入人心,与此同时,与《儿童法典》最初几年相关的关于“社会正义”和“家庭重新融合”的论述已经减弱。然后,我们转向围绕“直接收养”的辩论,提出了一个假设,即尽管合法性存疑,在官方话语中能见度为零,但它们对巴西的收养实践产生了巨大影响。最后,我们强调了儿童收养领域的沉默,这些沉默阻碍了对当前政策的评估以及对未来有效政策的规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(Re)descobrindo a adoção no Brasil trinta anos depois do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente
Based on documental sources and informal interviews with professionals involved in this theme, we propose in this article to describe changes in the field of child adoption in Brazil over the past thirty years. We begin with a methodological observation on the lack of systematic statistics on domestic adoption. We proceed to consider a growing emphasis in recent years on adoption through the National Adoption Registry (in particular of older children) as a solution for the large number of youngsters in institutional care. We suggest that a pragmatic view based on the individualized child’s rights has gained ground, at the same time that discourses on “social justice” and “family reintegration”, associated with the beginning years of the Children’s Code, have been toned down. We then turn to the debates around “direct adoptions”, raising the hypothesis that, although suffering from doubtful legitimacy and zero visibility in official discourse, they exert a great influence on adoption practice in Brazil. We finish by underlining silences in the field of child adoption that hinder the evaluation of present policies as well as the planning of effective policies in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信