法律障碍和亲密伴侣暴力幸存者的再次受害在犹他州法院导航，美国

IF 1.1 4区社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Women & Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2021-03-22 DOI:10.1080/08974454.2021.1900991

Lindsay B. Gezinski, K. Gonzalez-Pons

{"title":"法律障碍和亲密伴侣暴力幸存者的再次受害在犹他州法院导航，美国","authors":"Lindsay B. Gezinski, K. Gonzalez-Pons","doi":"10.1080/08974454.2021.1900991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Even though the majority of intimate partner violence (IPV) incidents remain unreported and unprosecuted, survivors find themselves navigating the legal system. One hundred and two survivors and service providers participated in semi-structured focus groups or interviews related to their IPV-related court experiences. Data analysis consisted of identifying themes, coding categories, and developing matrices. Themes included: (1) insufficient legal representation, (2) protection order access and enforcement, (3) revictimization in court settings, and (4) disparities in accountability. Participants pointed to a failure to enforce protection orders, mandated child visitation with perpetrators, and lenient sentencing as evidence that the legal system favors perpetrators. Findings indicate the need for IPV education for court personnel, as well as the expansion of public assistance and pro bono legal services.","PeriodicalId":51745,"journal":{"name":"Women & Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08974454.2021.1900991","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Barriers and Re-Victimization for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Navigating Courts in Utah, United States\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay B. Gezinski, K. Gonzalez-Pons\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08974454.2021.1900991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Even though the majority of intimate partner violence (IPV) incidents remain unreported and unprosecuted, survivors find themselves navigating the legal system. One hundred and two survivors and service providers participated in semi-structured focus groups or interviews related to their IPV-related court experiences. Data analysis consisted of identifying themes, coding categories, and developing matrices. Themes included: (1) insufficient legal representation, (2) protection order access and enforcement, (3) revictimization in court settings, and (4) disparities in accountability. Participants pointed to a failure to enforce protection orders, mandated child visitation with perpetrators, and lenient sentencing as evidence that the legal system favors perpetrators. Findings indicate the need for IPV education for court personnel, as well as the expansion of public assistance and pro bono legal services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08974454.2021.1900991\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1900991\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1900991","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要尽管大多数亲密伴侣暴力事件仍未报告和报告，但幸存者发现自己在法律体系中游刃有余。112名幸存者和服务提供者参加了与IPV相关的法庭经历相关的半结构化焦点小组或访谈。数据分析包括确定主题、编码类别和开发矩阵。主题包括：（1）法律代表不足，（2）保护令的获取和执行，（3）法院环境中的再次受害，以及（4）问责制方面的差异。与会者指出，未能执行保护令、强制要求对犯罪者进行儿童探视以及从宽量刑，都是法律体系偏袒犯罪者的证据。调查结果表明，需要对法院工作人员进行IPV教育，并扩大公共援助和无偿法律服务。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Legal Barriers and Re-Victimization for Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Navigating Courts in Utah, United States

Abstract Even though the majority of intimate partner violence (IPV) incidents remain unreported and unprosecuted, survivors find themselves navigating the legal system. One hundred and two survivors and service providers participated in semi-structured focus groups or interviews related to their IPV-related court experiences. Data analysis consisted of identifying themes, coding categories, and developing matrices. Themes included: (1) insufficient legal representation, (2) protection order access and enforcement, (3) revictimization in court settings, and (4) disparities in accountability. Participants pointed to a failure to enforce protection orders, mandated child visitation with perpetrators, and lenient sentencing as evidence that the legal system favors perpetrators. Findings indicate the need for IPV education for court personnel, as well as the expansion of public assistance and pro bono legal services.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Women & Criminal Justice Multiple-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Women & Criminal Justice is the only periodical devoted specifically to scholarly interdisciplinary and international research on all concerns related to women and criminal justice. It provides scholars with a single forum devoted to this critical specialty area in the fields of criminal justice, human rights, law, politics, sociology, social work, and women"s studies. Both qualitative and quantitative studies are welcomed, as are studies that test theories about women as victims, professionals and offenders.