综合评估环境模型的宏观经济批判:巴西的案例

IF 1.8 3区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Review of Keynesian Economics Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.4337/ROKE.2021.02.03

Rafael Cattan, Florent McIsaac

{"title":"综合评估环境模型的宏观经济批判:巴西的案例","authors":"Rafael Cattan, Florent McIsaac","doi":"10.4337/ROKE.2021.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper surveys integrated assessment models applied to Brazil. We show that these models belong to the environmental economics literature that fails to consider some of the most important aspects of the modern macroeconomic dynamics in Brazil. These features include monetary and financial balances, income distribution, and physical limits to growth. We argue that the most suitable framework for modeling a low-carbon Brazilian economy would incorporate both Post-Keynesian and ecological economics principles. This new modeling method would strengthen our understanding of environmental mitigation action consequences and would allow us to explore new climate-policy packages.","PeriodicalId":45671,"journal":{"name":"Review of Keynesian Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A macroeconomic critique of integrated assessment environmental models: the case of Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Cattan, Florent McIsaac\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/ROKE.2021.02.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper surveys integrated assessment models applied to Brazil. We show that these models belong to the environmental economics literature that fails to consider some of the most important aspects of the modern macroeconomic dynamics in Brazil. These features include monetary and financial balances, income distribution, and physical limits to growth. We argue that the most suitable framework for modeling a low-carbon Brazilian economy would incorporate both Post-Keynesian and ecological economics principles. This new modeling method would strengthen our understanding of environmental mitigation action consequences and would allow us to explore new climate-policy packages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Keynesian Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Keynesian Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/ROKE.2021.02.03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Keynesian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/ROKE.2021.02.03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文调查了适用于巴西的综合评估模型。我们表明，这些模型属于环境经济学文献，没有考虑巴西现代宏观经济动态的一些最重要方面。这些特征包括货币和金融平衡、收入分配以及增长的物理限制。我们认为，建立低碳巴西经济模型的最合适框架将包括后凯恩斯主义和生态经济学原则。这种新的建模方法将加强我们对环境缓解行动后果的理解，并使我们能够探索新的气候政策包。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A macroeconomic critique of integrated assessment environmental models: the case of Brazil

This paper surveys integrated assessment models applied to Brazil. We show that these models belong to the environmental economics literature that fails to consider some of the most important aspects of the modern macroeconomic dynamics in Brazil. These features include monetary and financial balances, income distribution, and physical limits to growth. We argue that the most suitable framework for modeling a low-carbon Brazilian economy would incorporate both Post-Keynesian and ecological economics principles. This new modeling method would strengthen our understanding of environmental mitigation action consequences and would allow us to explore new climate-policy packages.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Review of Keynesian Economics ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Review of Keynesian Economics (ROKE) is dedicated to the promotion of research in Keynesian economics. Not only does that include Keynesian ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. The journal provides a forum for developing and disseminating Keynesian ideas, and intends to encourage critical exchange with other macroeconomic paradigms. The journal is dedicated to the development of Keynesian theory and policy. In our view, Keynesian theory should hold a similar place in economics to that held by the theory of evolution in biology. Many individual economists still work within the Keynesian paradigm, but intellectual success demands institutional support that can leverage those individual efforts. The journal offers such support by providing a forum for developing and sharing Keynesian ideas. Not only does that include ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. We see a bright future for the Keynesian approach to macroeconomics and invite the economics profession to join us by subscribing to the journal and submitting manuscripts.