丹麦城镇城市发展公司的所有权和组织:合作治理方法

IF 2 Q3 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING
Luise Noring
{"title":"丹麦城镇城市发展公司的所有权和组织:合作治理方法","authors":"Luise Noring","doi":"10.1080/02697459.2022.2033481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rooted in Pestoff’s third-sector organisation and undergirded by extensive empirical research, this paper considers how different public, private and civic actors interact and cogovern urban development projects. Public actors do not necessarily forego on value generation and capture despite public, private and civic partnerships frequently being analysed in terms of a rise in private values at the expense of public values. In fact, the article finds that differences in goals and priorities among public, private and civic actors may lead to differences in ownership and organisational roles without infringing on the public actors’ ability to generate and capture value.","PeriodicalId":54201,"journal":{"name":"Planning Practice and Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"26 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ownership and organisation of urban development corporations in Danish towns and cities: a cooperative governance approach\",\"authors\":\"Luise Noring\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02697459.2022.2033481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Rooted in Pestoff’s third-sector organisation and undergirded by extensive empirical research, this paper considers how different public, private and civic actors interact and cogovern urban development projects. Public actors do not necessarily forego on value generation and capture despite public, private and civic partnerships frequently being analysed in terms of a rise in private values at the expense of public values. In fact, the article finds that differences in goals and priorities among public, private and civic actors may lead to differences in ownership and organisational roles without infringing on the public actors’ ability to generate and capture value.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Planning Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2022.2033481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Planning Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2022.2033481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文植根于Pestoff的第三部门组织,并以广泛的实证研究为基础,考虑了不同的公共、私营和公民行为者如何互动和共同管理城市发展项目。尽管公共、私人和公民伙伴关系经常被分析为以牺牲公共价值为代价的私人价值上升,但公共行为者并不一定会放弃价值产生和获取。事实上,文章发现,公共、私人和公民行为者在目标和优先事项上的差异可能会导致所有权和组织角色的差异,而不会侵犯公共行为者产生和获取价值的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ownership and organisation of urban development corporations in Danish towns and cities: a cooperative governance approach
ABSTRACT Rooted in Pestoff’s third-sector organisation and undergirded by extensive empirical research, this paper considers how different public, private and civic actors interact and cogovern urban development projects. Public actors do not necessarily forego on value generation and capture despite public, private and civic partnerships frequently being analysed in terms of a rise in private values at the expense of public values. In fact, the article finds that differences in goals and priorities among public, private and civic actors may lead to differences in ownership and organisational roles without infringing on the public actors’ ability to generate and capture value.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Planning Practice and Research
Planning Practice and Research REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Over the last decade, Planning Practice & Research (PPR) has established itself as the source for information on current research in planning practice. It is intended for reflective, critical academics, professionals and students who are concerned to keep abreast of and challenge current thinking. PPR is committed to: •bridging the gaps between planning research, practice and education, and between different planning systems •providing a forum for an international readership to discuss and review research on planning practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信