中国社会科学与人文科学研究中的马太效应——CSSCI与SSCI的比较分析

IF 3.5 3区管理学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS

Scientometrics Pub Date : 2023-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y

Bo Yu, Fei Shu

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Scientometrics 管理科学-计算机：跨学科应用

CiteScore

7.20

自引率

17.90%

发文量

351

审稿时长

1.5 months

期刊介绍： Scientometrics aims at publishing original studies, short communications, preliminary reports, review papers, letters to the editor and book reviews on scientometrics. The topics covered are results of research concerned with the quantitative features and characteristics of science. Emphasis is placed on investigations in which the development and mechanism of science are studied by means of (statistical) mathematical methods. The Journal also provides the reader with important up-to-date information about international meetings and events in scientometrics and related fields. Appropriate bibliographic compilations are published as a separate section. Due to its fully interdisciplinary character, Scientometrics is indispensable to research workers and research administrators throughout the world. It provides valuable assistance to librarians and documentalists in central scientific agencies, ministries, research institutes and laboratories. Scientometrics includes the Journal of Research Communication Studies. Consequently its aims and scope cover that of the latter, namely, to bring the results of research investigations together in one place, in such a form that they will be of use not only to the investigators themselves but also to the entrepreneurs and research workers who form the object of these studies.