团队心理需求与团队创造性的激进与增量

IF 2.9 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Human Performance Pub Date : 2021-04-05 DOI:10.1080/08959285.2021.1902330

S. Sung, Jin Nam Choi

{"title":"团队心理需求与团队创造性的激进与增量","authors":"S. Sung, Jin Nam Choi","doi":"10.1080/08959285.2021.1902330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study distinguishes between radical and incremental creativity at the team level. In addition, group composition in terms of members’ psychological needs is identified as a distinct driver of radical and incremental team creativity. Statistical analysis based on multisource data of 65 work teams shows that (a) team-level need for achievement has a negative main effect on radical team creativity, which disappears in teams with optimistic leaders; (b) team-level need for affiliation has a negative main effect on incremental team creativity, which becomes positive when teams possess high social competence; and (c) team-level need for power is positively related to radical and incremental team creativity. Our analysis demonstrates the multifaceted nature of team creativity and the distinct implications of team-level psychological needs for team creativity.","PeriodicalId":47825,"journal":{"name":"Human Performance","volume":"34 1","pages":"149 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08959285.2021.1902330","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team Psychological Needs and Radical versus Incremental Creativity of Work Teams\",\"authors\":\"S. Sung, Jin Nam Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08959285.2021.1902330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study distinguishes between radical and incremental creativity at the team level. In addition, group composition in terms of members’ psychological needs is identified as a distinct driver of radical and incremental team creativity. Statistical analysis based on multisource data of 65 work teams shows that (a) team-level need for achievement has a negative main effect on radical team creativity, which disappears in teams with optimistic leaders; (b) team-level need for affiliation has a negative main effect on incremental team creativity, which becomes positive when teams possess high social competence; and (c) team-level need for power is positively related to radical and incremental team creativity. Our analysis demonstrates the multifaceted nature of team creativity and the distinct implications of team-level psychological needs for team creativity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Performance\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08959285.2021.1902330\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.1902330\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Performance","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2021.1902330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究区分了团队层面的激进创造力和增量创造力。此外，从成员心理需求的角度来看，团队构成被认为是激进和渐进团队创造力的独特驱动因素。基于65个工作团队的多源数据的统计分析表明：（a）团队层面的成就需求对激进团队创造力有负向的主效应，而在领导者乐观的团队中，这种负向主效应消失；（b）团队层面的隶属关系需求对团队创造力的增量有负向的主效应，当团队具有较高的社会能力时，团队创造力就变为正向；（c）团队层面的权力需求与激进和渐进的团队创造力呈正相关。我们的分析表明了团队创造力的多面性，以及团队层面的心理需求对团队创造力的独特影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Team Psychological Needs and Radical versus Incremental Creativity of Work Teams

ABSTRACT This study distinguishes between radical and incremental creativity at the team level. In addition, group composition in terms of members’ psychological needs is identified as a distinct driver of radical and incremental team creativity. Statistical analysis based on multisource data of 65 work teams shows that (a) team-level need for achievement has a negative main effect on radical team creativity, which disappears in teams with optimistic leaders; (b) team-level need for affiliation has a negative main effect on incremental team creativity, which becomes positive when teams possess high social competence; and (c) team-level need for power is positively related to radical and incremental team creativity. Our analysis demonstrates the multifaceted nature of team creativity and the distinct implications of team-level psychological needs for team creativity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Human Performance PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Performance publishes research investigating the nature and role of performance in the workplace and in organizational settings and offers a rich variety of information going beyond the study of traditional job behavior. Dedicated to presenting original research, theory, and measurement methods, the journal investigates individual, team, and firm level performance factors that influence work and organizational effectiveness. Human Performance is a respected forum for behavioral scientists interested in variables that motivate and promote high-level human performance, particularly in organizational and occupational settings. The journal seeks to identify and stimulate relevant research, communication, and theory concerning human capabilities and effectiveness. It serves as a valuable intellectual link between such disciplines as industrial-organizational psychology, individual differences, work physiology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and human factors.