乔治·辛克莱被忽视的论文:一些影响和反应

IF 0.6 Q3 MATHEMATICS

British Journal for the History of Mathematics Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/26375451.2019.1673101

A. Craik

{"title":"乔治·辛克莱被忽视的论文:一些影响和反应","authors":"A. Craik","doi":"10.1080/26375451.2019.1673101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The works of the Scottish natural philosopher George Sinclair (c.1630–1696) received far more criticism than praise, as described by (Craik, A D D, ‘The hydrostatical work of George Sinclair (c. 1630–1696): their neglect and criticism’, Notes & Records of the Royal Society, 72/3 (2018), 239–273), which focused mainly on Sinclair’s insightful account of hydrostatics. Here, we mention those few who influenced his work, and those who later commented upon it. His flawed account of the motion of pendulums, and the criticisms of it by James Gregory, are particularly examined.","PeriodicalId":36683,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","volume":"35 1","pages":"43 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26375451.2019.1673101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"George Sinclair’s neglected Treatises: some influences and reactions\",\"authors\":\"A. Craik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26375451.2019.1673101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The works of the Scottish natural philosopher George Sinclair (c.1630–1696) received far more criticism than praise, as described by (Craik, A D D, ‘The hydrostatical work of George Sinclair (c. 1630–1696): their neglect and criticism’, Notes & Records of the Royal Society, 72/3 (2018), 239–273), which focused mainly on Sinclair’s insightful account of hydrostatics. Here, we mention those few who influenced his work, and those who later commented upon it. His flawed account of the motion of pendulums, and the criticisms of it by James Gregory, are particularly examined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"43 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26375451.2019.1673101\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal for the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2019.1673101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2019.1673101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

苏格兰自然哲学家乔治·辛克莱（约1630–1696）的作品受到的批评远多于赞扬，如（Craik，A D D，“乔治·辛克莱的流体静力学工作（约1630-1696）：他们的忽视和批评”，皇家学会笔记与记录，72/3（2018），239–273）所述，主要集中在辛克莱对流体静力学的深刻描述上。在这里，我们要提到那些影响他的作品的少数人，以及后来对他的作品发表评论的人。他对钟摆运动的错误描述，以及詹姆斯·格雷戈里对它的批评，都受到了特别的审视。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

George Sinclair’s neglected Treatises: some influences and reactions

The works of the Scottish natural philosopher George Sinclair (c.1630–1696) received far more criticism than praise, as described by (Craik, A D D, ‘The hydrostatical work of George Sinclair (c. 1630–1696): their neglect and criticism’, Notes & Records of the Royal Society, 72/3 (2018), 239–273), which focused mainly on Sinclair’s insightful account of hydrostatics. Here, we mention those few who influenced his work, and those who later commented upon it. His flawed account of the motion of pendulums, and the criticisms of it by James Gregory, are particularly examined.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

British Journal for the History of Mathematics Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量