F. Duarte, Agustín Caro, S. Delgado, A. Asfennato, Laura López, F. Hernandez, M. V. Calvo
{"title":"昆虫不育技术在两种大规模诱捕布局中控制头角绦虫(双翅目:绦虫科)和蝇蛆捕获的效果","authors":"F. Duarte, Agustín Caro, S. Delgado, A. Asfennato, Laura López, F. Hernandez, M. V. Calvo","doi":"10.1080/09670874.2022.2130468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two trials were done, one to evaluate SIT effectiveness to control Uruguayan medfly populations, and another to evaluate the medfly catches in two mass trapping layouts. First, in an 18 ha plot of ‘Cripps pink’ apple 756,000 sterile males of Ceratitis capitata were released from February to March in 2020, and 990,000 from February to April in 2021. Simultaneously, three 4 ha plots with mass trapping were evaluated as controls. The average sterile:wild ratio in Jackson traps was 13.2 and no differences were found in fruit damage. The second trial consisted in three plots of 1 ha of ’Afourer’ mandarin with 50 Susbin-TMA traps per ha, in both grid and perimeter layouts. Five thousand sterile males were released in the center of each plot, and catches were evaluated. The mean recapture of sterile males was 14,9 and 3.3 in the grid and a perimeter design respectively. C. capitata population were controlled, and SIT could be applied in combination with mass trapping in a perimeter design without requiring a substantial increase in the sterile male dose released.","PeriodicalId":14275,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pest Management","volume":"68 1","pages":"402 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sterile insect technique (sit) effectiveness to control Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) and medfly catches in two mass trapping layouts\",\"authors\":\"F. Duarte, Agustín Caro, S. Delgado, A. Asfennato, Laura López, F. Hernandez, M. V. Calvo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09670874.2022.2130468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Two trials were done, one to evaluate SIT effectiveness to control Uruguayan medfly populations, and another to evaluate the medfly catches in two mass trapping layouts. First, in an 18 ha plot of ‘Cripps pink’ apple 756,000 sterile males of Ceratitis capitata were released from February to March in 2020, and 990,000 from February to April in 2021. Simultaneously, three 4 ha plots with mass trapping were evaluated as controls. The average sterile:wild ratio in Jackson traps was 13.2 and no differences were found in fruit damage. The second trial consisted in three plots of 1 ha of ’Afourer’ mandarin with 50 Susbin-TMA traps per ha, in both grid and perimeter layouts. Five thousand sterile males were released in the center of each plot, and catches were evaluated. The mean recapture of sterile males was 14,9 and 3.3 in the grid and a perimeter design respectively. C. capitata population were controlled, and SIT could be applied in combination with mass trapping in a perimeter design without requiring a substantial increase in the sterile male dose released.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pest Management\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"402 - 413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pest Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2130468\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pest Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2130468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sterile insect technique (sit) effectiveness to control Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) and medfly catches in two mass trapping layouts
Abstract Two trials were done, one to evaluate SIT effectiveness to control Uruguayan medfly populations, and another to evaluate the medfly catches in two mass trapping layouts. First, in an 18 ha plot of ‘Cripps pink’ apple 756,000 sterile males of Ceratitis capitata were released from February to March in 2020, and 990,000 from February to April in 2021. Simultaneously, three 4 ha plots with mass trapping were evaluated as controls. The average sterile:wild ratio in Jackson traps was 13.2 and no differences were found in fruit damage. The second trial consisted in three plots of 1 ha of ’Afourer’ mandarin with 50 Susbin-TMA traps per ha, in both grid and perimeter layouts. Five thousand sterile males were released in the center of each plot, and catches were evaluated. The mean recapture of sterile males was 14,9 and 3.3 in the grid and a perimeter design respectively. C. capitata population were controlled, and SIT could be applied in combination with mass trapping in a perimeter design without requiring a substantial increase in the sterile male dose released.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Pest Management publishes original research papers and reviews concerned with pest management in the broad sense, covering the control of pests (invertebrates, vertebrates and weeds) and diseases of plants, fungi and their products – including biological control, varietal and cultural control, chemical controland interference methods.
The management of invasive species is of special interest. We also encourage submissions dealing with interactions of multiple pests such as arthropods and plant pathogens, pathogens and weeds or weeds and arthropods as well as those dealing with the indirect and direct effects of climate change on sustainable agricultural practices.