女性只想要配额:智利右翼平权行动的性别分歧

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Julieta Suárez-Cao
{"title":"女性只想要配额:智利右翼平权行动的性别分歧","authors":"Julieta Suárez-Cao","doi":"10.7440/colombiaint115.2023.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/context: This article examines attitudes towards gender quotas by right-wing leadership in Chile and assesses gender gaps in supporting affirmative action. Methodology: The study uses original data from a survey of leaders of Chile Vamos, a right-wing political alliance in Chile. A series of logistic models with finite-sample corrections are estimated to examine the attitudes of right-wing leaders towards gender quotas and support for affirmative action policies. The models control for various demographic and political factors that may affect attitudes towards affirmative action. Conclusions: The findings for right-wing women in Chile are similar to those for Northern democracies. Right-wing elites show a significant gender gap on issues related to affirmative action and gender equality. Right-wing women are more likely to support affirmative action policies than their male counterparts. Originality: Quotas increase women’s autonomy and recognize that women are historically disadvantaged. The findings of this article support the importance of descriptive representation to the extent that attitudes of right-wing women differ significantly on issues close to their gender.","PeriodicalId":35154,"journal":{"name":"Colombia Internacional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women Just Wanna Have Quotas: The Gender Divide on Affirmative Action in the Chilean Right\",\"authors\":\"Julieta Suárez-Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.7440/colombiaint115.2023.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective/context: This article examines attitudes towards gender quotas by right-wing leadership in Chile and assesses gender gaps in supporting affirmative action. Methodology: The study uses original data from a survey of leaders of Chile Vamos, a right-wing political alliance in Chile. A series of logistic models with finite-sample corrections are estimated to examine the attitudes of right-wing leaders towards gender quotas and support for affirmative action policies. The models control for various demographic and political factors that may affect attitudes towards affirmative action. Conclusions: The findings for right-wing women in Chile are similar to those for Northern democracies. Right-wing elites show a significant gender gap on issues related to affirmative action and gender equality. Right-wing women are more likely to support affirmative action policies than their male counterparts. Originality: Quotas increase women’s autonomy and recognize that women are historically disadvantaged. The findings of this article support the importance of descriptive representation to the extent that attitudes of right-wing women differ significantly on issues close to their gender.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colombia Internacional\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colombia Internacional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint115.2023.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombia Internacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint115.2023.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标/背景:本文考察了智利右翼领导人对性别配额的态度,并评估了在支持平权行动方面的性别差距。方法:该研究使用了对智利右翼政治联盟Chile Vamos领导人的调查的原始数据。估计了一系列具有有限样本校正的逻辑模型,以检验右翼领导人对性别配额和支持平权行动政策的态度。这些模型控制了可能影响对平权行动态度的各种人口和政治因素。结论:智利右翼女性的调查结果与北方民主国家的调查结果相似。右翼精英在与平权行动和性别平等有关的问题上表现出显著的性别差距。右翼女性比男性更有可能支持平权行动政策。独创性:配额增加了妇女的自主权,并承认妇女在历史上处于不利地位。这篇文章的研究结果支持描述性表述的重要性,因为右翼女性在与其性别相近的问题上的态度存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women Just Wanna Have Quotas: The Gender Divide on Affirmative Action in the Chilean Right
Objective/context: This article examines attitudes towards gender quotas by right-wing leadership in Chile and assesses gender gaps in supporting affirmative action. Methodology: The study uses original data from a survey of leaders of Chile Vamos, a right-wing political alliance in Chile. A series of logistic models with finite-sample corrections are estimated to examine the attitudes of right-wing leaders towards gender quotas and support for affirmative action policies. The models control for various demographic and political factors that may affect attitudes towards affirmative action. Conclusions: The findings for right-wing women in Chile are similar to those for Northern democracies. Right-wing elites show a significant gender gap on issues related to affirmative action and gender equality. Right-wing women are more likely to support affirmative action policies than their male counterparts. Originality: Quotas increase women’s autonomy and recognize that women are historically disadvantaged. The findings of this article support the importance of descriptive representation to the extent that attitudes of right-wing women differ significantly on issues close to their gender.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colombia Internacional
Colombia Internacional Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信