新专栏:图书馆员作为模范思考者

Q4 Social Sciences
Alex Zhang
{"title":"新专栏:图书馆员作为模范思考者","authors":"Alex Zhang","doi":"10.1080/0270319x.2022.2109342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As indicated in the previous issue, I want to begin a new column to promote dialogues and exchanges on law library services and operations using commonly recognized thinking concepts and intellectual models developed in different disciplines. The hope is to promote active thinking and occasionally, perhaps, unconventional thinking to help assess our past, examine our present, and forecast our future collectively. The purpose of this column is to recommend several areas for consideration as a starting point. The recommendation never intends to be comprehensive or conclusive.1 We invite your contribution as a response or an independent article under this broad theme to help make this dialogue more progressive, open-ended, and dynamic.","PeriodicalId":39856,"journal":{"name":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","volume":"41 1","pages":"98 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Column: Librarians as Model Thinkers\",\"authors\":\"Alex Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0270319x.2022.2109342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As indicated in the previous issue, I want to begin a new column to promote dialogues and exchanges on law library services and operations using commonly recognized thinking concepts and intellectual models developed in different disciplines. The hope is to promote active thinking and occasionally, perhaps, unconventional thinking to help assess our past, examine our present, and forecast our future collectively. The purpose of this column is to recommend several areas for consideration as a starting point. The recommendation never intends to be comprehensive or conclusive.1 We invite your contribution as a response or an independent article under this broad theme to help make this dialogue more progressive, open-ended, and dynamic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Reference Services Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"98 - 100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Reference Services Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319x.2022.2109342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319x.2022.2109342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如上期所述,我想开设一个新的专栏,利用不同学科发展的公认的思维概念和智力模式,促进法律图书馆服务和运作的对话和交流。希望能促进积极的思考,偶尔也可能是非常规的思考,以帮助我们共同评估过去,审视现在,预测未来。本专栏的目的是推荐几个可以作为起点考虑的领域。这项建议绝不打算是全面的或结论性的我们邀请您在这一广泛主题下作出回应或撰写独立文章,以帮助使这一对话更加进步、开放和充满活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Column: Librarians as Model Thinkers
As indicated in the previous issue, I want to begin a new column to promote dialogues and exchanges on law library services and operations using commonly recognized thinking concepts and intellectual models developed in different disciplines. The hope is to promote active thinking and occasionally, perhaps, unconventional thinking to help assess our past, examine our present, and forecast our future collectively. The purpose of this column is to recommend several areas for consideration as a starting point. The recommendation never intends to be comprehensive or conclusive.1 We invite your contribution as a response or an independent article under this broad theme to help make this dialogue more progressive, open-ended, and dynamic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: An important forum for daily problems and issues, Legal Reference Services Quarterly will assist you in your day-to-day work as it has been helping other law librarians and members of the legal profession for over a decade. You will find articles that are serious, humorous, critical, or simply helpful to the working librarian. Annotated subject bibliographies, overviews of legal literature, reviews of commonly used tools, and the inclusion of reference problems unique to corporate law libraries, judicial libraries, and academic collections will keep you up-to-date on the continuously expanding volume of legal materials and their use in legal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信