从当代和历史的角度组织反资本主义国际主义

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
R. Latham
{"title":"从当代和历史的角度组织反资本主义国际主义","authors":"R. Latham","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2022.2139077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although transnational collective anticapitalist action is the Left’s historical instinct, past efforts at collaboration failed at building a comprehensive, inclusive, and sustainable international. Reflecting on internationalism’s history, this essay challenges assumptions and approaches to internationalism and unity. History suggests common aims and solidarity are insufficient, especially when the pursuit of collaboration from distinct positions leads to conflict. Creating a more institutionalized context for unity promises a more enduring collaboration. A revitalized Left institutionalism is needed. It should endeavor to build institutions especially for mediation (a practice underemphasized in the Left’s historical tradition), such as an international conflict-adjudicating “workers and peoples” tribunal. Institutions like a tribunal composed of rank-and-file workers could be put at the center of international socialism along with leaders and full-time activists, constituting a coactive power that would be part of an expanded Left institutional sphere aimed at creating an anticapitalist international system within the existing international system.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizing Anticapitalist Internationalism in Contemporary and Historical Perspective\",\"authors\":\"R. Latham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2022.2139077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although transnational collective anticapitalist action is the Left’s historical instinct, past efforts at collaboration failed at building a comprehensive, inclusive, and sustainable international. Reflecting on internationalism’s history, this essay challenges assumptions and approaches to internationalism and unity. History suggests common aims and solidarity are insufficient, especially when the pursuit of collaboration from distinct positions leads to conflict. Creating a more institutionalized context for unity promises a more enduring collaboration. A revitalized Left institutionalism is needed. It should endeavor to build institutions especially for mediation (a practice underemphasized in the Left’s historical tradition), such as an international conflict-adjudicating “workers and peoples” tribunal. Institutions like a tribunal composed of rank-and-file workers could be put at the center of international socialism along with leaders and full-time activists, constituting a coactive power that would be part of an expanded Left institutional sphere aimed at creating an anticapitalist international system within the existing international system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2139077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2022.2139077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管跨国集体反资本主义行动是左翼的历史本能,但过去的合作努力未能建立一个全面、包容和可持续的国际社会。本文反思国际主义的历史,对国际主义和团结的假设和方法提出了挑战。历史表明,共同的目标和团结是不够的,特别是当不同立场的合作追求导致冲突时。为团结创造一个更加制度化的环境,可以保证更持久的合作。我们需要重振左翼制度主义。它应该努力建立专门用于调解的机构(这是左派历史传统中未被重视的一种实践),比如一个国际冲突裁决“工人和人民”法庭。像一个由普通工人组成的法庭这样的机构,可以与领导人和全职活动家一起,放在国际社会主义的中心,构成一种共同的力量,它将成为扩大的左翼机构领域的一部分,旨在在现有的国际体系中创建一个反资本主义的国际体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizing Anticapitalist Internationalism in Contemporary and Historical Perspective
Although transnational collective anticapitalist action is the Left’s historical instinct, past efforts at collaboration failed at building a comprehensive, inclusive, and sustainable international. Reflecting on internationalism’s history, this essay challenges assumptions and approaches to internationalism and unity. History suggests common aims and solidarity are insufficient, especially when the pursuit of collaboration from distinct positions leads to conflict. Creating a more institutionalized context for unity promises a more enduring collaboration. A revitalized Left institutionalism is needed. It should endeavor to build institutions especially for mediation (a practice underemphasized in the Left’s historical tradition), such as an international conflict-adjudicating “workers and peoples” tribunal. Institutions like a tribunal composed of rank-and-file workers could be put at the center of international socialism along with leaders and full-time activists, constituting a coactive power that would be part of an expanded Left institutional sphere aimed at creating an anticapitalist international system within the existing international system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信