拒绝接种疫苗不是搭便车

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics Pub Date : 2021-06-12 DOI:10.23941/EJPE.V14I1.555

E. Bradley, M. Navin

{"title":"拒绝接种疫苗不是搭便车","authors":"E. Bradley, M. Navin","doi":"10.23941/EJPE.V14I1.555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine refusal is not a free rider problem. The claim that vaccine refusers are free riders is inconsistent with the beliefs and motivations of most vaccine refusers. This claim also inaccurately depicts the relationship between an individual’s immunization choice, their ability to enjoy the benefits of community protection, and the costs and benefits that individuals experience from immunization and community protection. Modeling vaccine refusers as free riders also likely distorts the ethical analysis of vaccine refusal and may lead to unsuccessful policy interventions.","PeriodicalId":37914,"journal":{"name":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccine Refusal Is Not Free Riding\",\"authors\":\"E. Bradley, M. Navin\",\"doi\":\"10.23941/EJPE.V14I1.555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vaccine refusal is not a free rider problem. The claim that vaccine refusers are free riders is inconsistent with the beliefs and motivations of most vaccine refusers. This claim also inaccurately depicts the relationship between an individual’s immunization choice, their ability to enjoy the benefits of community protection, and the costs and benefits that individuals experience from immunization and community protection. Modeling vaccine refusers as free riders also likely distorts the ethical analysis of vaccine refusal and may lead to unsuccessful policy interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23941/EJPE.V14I1.555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23941/EJPE.V14I1.555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

拒绝接种疫苗不是一个搭便车的问题。疫苗拒绝者是搭便车的说法与大多数疫苗拒绝者的信念和动机不一致。这种说法也不准确地描述了个人的免疫选择、他们享受社区保护好处的能力以及个人从免疫和社区保护中获得的成本和好处之间的关系。将疫苗拒绝者建模为搭便车也可能扭曲对疫苗拒绝的伦理分析，并可能导致政策干预的失败。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Vaccine Refusal Is Not Free Riding

Vaccine refusal is not a free rider problem. The claim that vaccine refusers are free riders is inconsistent with the beliefs and motivations of most vaccine refusers. This claim also inaccurately depicts the relationship between an individual’s immunization choice, their ability to enjoy the benefits of community protection, and the costs and benefits that individuals experience from immunization and community protection. Modeling vaccine refusers as free riders also likely distorts the ethical analysis of vaccine refusal and may lead to unsuccessful policy interventions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics (EJPE) is a peer-reviewed bi-annual academic journal supported by the Erasmus Institute for Philosophy and Economics at the Erasmus School of Philosophy of Erasmus University Rotterdam. EJPE publishes research on the methodology, history, ethics, and interdisciplinary relations of economics, and welcomes contributions from all scholars with an interest in any of its research domains. EJPE is an Open Access Journal: all the content is permanently available online without subscription or payment. EJPE aims to... -Publish high quality original research on the intersection of philosophy and economics. -Support the inter-disciplinary development of the field with critical survey papers covering ongoing debates and information about relevant publications. -Provide a forum that is friendly to young scholars, and supported by an authoritative, efficient, and constructive review process.