承认背叛:纳萨尔听证会中受害者影响陈述的修辞力量

IF 0.7 4区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Rhetoric Review Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/07350198.2021.2002072

Shari J. Stenberg

{"title":"承认背叛:纳萨尔听证会中受害者影响陈述的修辞力量","authors":"Shari J. Stenberg","doi":"10.1080/07350198.2021.2002072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay features a grounded theory analysis of the 156 Victim Impact Statements delivered by sexual assault survivors of Olympics and Michigan State University doctor Larry Nassar. I show how the Victim Impact Statements function as public, collective testimony that highlight the ramifications of unacknowledged betrayal. They narrate how adults and institutions looked away from abuse in order to maintain the status quo, and the athletes learned to trust authorities over themselves. Their testimonies destabilize assault as a crime limited to an assailant and a victim, demand accountability from those who looked away, and reclaim trust in their own witnessing.","PeriodicalId":44627,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"45 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acknowledging Betrayal: The Rhetorical Power of Victim Impact Statements in the Nassar Hearing\",\"authors\":\"Shari J. Stenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07350198.2021.2002072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay features a grounded theory analysis of the 156 Victim Impact Statements delivered by sexual assault survivors of Olympics and Michigan State University doctor Larry Nassar. I show how the Victim Impact Statements function as public, collective testimony that highlight the ramifications of unacknowledged betrayal. They narrate how adults and institutions looked away from abuse in order to maintain the status quo, and the athletes learned to trust authorities over themselves. Their testimonies destabilize assault as a crime limited to an assailant and a victim, demand accountability from those who looked away, and reclaim trust in their own witnessing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhetoric Review\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"45 - 58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhetoric Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2021.2002072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2021.2002072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文对奥运会性侵幸存者和密歇根州立大学博士拉里·纳萨尔发表的156份受害者影响声明进行了有根据的理论分析。我展示了受害者影响声明如何作为公开的集体证词发挥作用，突出了未被承认的背叛的后果。他们讲述了成年人和机构如何为了维持现状而远离虐待，以及运动员如何学会信任当局而不是自己。他们的证词破坏了袭击作为一种仅限于袭击者和受害者的犯罪的稳定，要求那些视而不见的人承担责任，并重新获得对自己目击者的信任。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Acknowledging Betrayal: The Rhetorical Power of Victim Impact Statements in the Nassar Hearing

ABSTRACT This essay features a grounded theory analysis of the 156 Victim Impact Statements delivered by sexual assault survivors of Olympics and Michigan State University doctor Larry Nassar. I show how the Victim Impact Statements function as public, collective testimony that highlight the ramifications of unacknowledged betrayal. They narrate how adults and institutions looked away from abuse in order to maintain the status quo, and the athletes learned to trust authorities over themselves. Their testimonies destabilize assault as a crime limited to an assailant and a victim, demand accountability from those who looked away, and reclaim trust in their own witnessing.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Rhetoric Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Rhetoric Review (RR), a scholarly interdisciplinary journal of rhetoric, publishes in all areas of rhetoric and writing and provides a professional forum for its readers to consider and discuss current topics and issues. The journal publishes manuscripts that explore the breadth and depth of the discipline, including history, theory, writing, praxis, philosophy, professional writing, rhetorical criticism, cultural studies, multiple literacies, technology, literature, public address, graduate education, and professional issues. Rhetoric Review also invites readers to contribute to the Burkean Parlor, a discourse forum for discussion of Rhetoric Review"s published articles, as well as professional issues. Essay reviews, commissioned by the editor, are included as a regular feature.