尼日利亚贝宁市儿童使用玻璃离聚物和树脂基裂隙密封胶治疗时间和费用的比较分析

PU Ogordi, E. Sote, F. Oredugba, I. Ize-Iyamu
{"title":"尼日利亚贝宁市儿童使用玻璃离聚物和树脂基裂隙密封胶治疗时间和费用的比较分析","authors":"PU Ogordi, E. Sote, F. Oredugba, I. Ize-Iyamu","doi":"10.61172/ndj.v25i1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dental service utilization in children is reduced as a result of long treatment times and prohibitive cost of treatment. This may result in  an increase in early childhood caries and subsequent premature tooth loss. Fissure sealants are a preventable method in the management of  dental caries but the cost may be a barrier to early treatment. \nAim: To compare the duration and cost of sealant treatment between glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants among children in Benin City,Nigeria. \nMaterials and Methods: All occlusal surfaces of the lower permanent first molars (2 teeth each in a total number of 50 children) were sealed andincluded in the study (n=100). A split-mouth design was used in which a light cure Bis-GMA resin-based sealant was compared with a glass-ionomersealant. They were then randomly placed in 50 matched contralateral pairs of permanent first molar teeth and a stop watch used to record the duration of placement. The cost of treatment was calculated by dividing the cost of the sealant kit with the total number of sealed occlusal surfaces. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0 with the chi square test for determination of variables. Probability values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. \nResults: The duration of sealant treatment using resin based sealant ranged from 235 to 446 seconds (mean time 318.86 +55.54 secs); while theduration of sealant treatment using glass ionomer based sealant ranged from 238 to 360 seconds (a mean time 292.57 +33.56 secs); and this wasstatistically significant (P<0.001). The cost of sealing a tooth surface using resin sealant (Clinpro®) was five hundred and seventy naira only. Similarly, the cost of sealing a tooth surface using glass ionomer based sealant (GC Fuji triage®) was eight hundred and forty naira only. \nConclusion: Less chairside time is required for sealant treatment using glass ionomer than resin based sealant for fissure sealing procedures. The use of resin based fissure sealant is relatively cheaper when compared with glass ionomer based sealant \n ","PeriodicalId":79241,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Dental Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of the Duration and Cost of Treatment Between Glass Ionomer and Resin Based Fissure Sealants among Children in Benin City, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"PU Ogordi, E. Sote, F. Oredugba, I. Ize-Iyamu\",\"doi\":\"10.61172/ndj.v25i1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Dental service utilization in children is reduced as a result of long treatment times and prohibitive cost of treatment. This may result in  an increase in early childhood caries and subsequent premature tooth loss. Fissure sealants are a preventable method in the management of  dental caries but the cost may be a barrier to early treatment. \\nAim: To compare the duration and cost of sealant treatment between glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants among children in Benin City,Nigeria. \\nMaterials and Methods: All occlusal surfaces of the lower permanent first molars (2 teeth each in a total number of 50 children) were sealed andincluded in the study (n=100). A split-mouth design was used in which a light cure Bis-GMA resin-based sealant was compared with a glass-ionomersealant. They were then randomly placed in 50 matched contralateral pairs of permanent first molar teeth and a stop watch used to record the duration of placement. The cost of treatment was calculated by dividing the cost of the sealant kit with the total number of sealed occlusal surfaces. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0 with the chi square test for determination of variables. Probability values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. \\nResults: The duration of sealant treatment using resin based sealant ranged from 235 to 446 seconds (mean time 318.86 +55.54 secs); while theduration of sealant treatment using glass ionomer based sealant ranged from 238 to 360 seconds (a mean time 292.57 +33.56 secs); and this wasstatistically significant (P<0.001). The cost of sealing a tooth surface using resin sealant (Clinpro®) was five hundred and seventy naira only. Similarly, the cost of sealing a tooth surface using glass ionomer based sealant (GC Fuji triage®) was eight hundred and forty naira only. \\nConclusion: Less chairside time is required for sealant treatment using glass ionomer than resin based sealant for fissure sealing procedures. The use of resin based fissure sealant is relatively cheaper when compared with glass ionomer based sealant \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":79241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61172/ndj.v25i1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61172/ndj.v25i1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于治疗时间长和治疗费用高昂,儿童的牙科服务利用率降低。这可能导致儿童早期龋齿的增加和随后的过早牙齿脱落。裂隙封闭剂是治疗龋齿的一种可预防的方法,但其成本可能是早期治疗的障碍。目的:比较尼日利亚贝宁市儿童使用玻璃离聚物和树脂基裂隙密封剂进行密封剂治疗的时间和成本。材料和方法:对50名儿童的下恒第一磨牙(各2颗牙齿)的所有咬合面进行封闭,并将其纳入研究(n=100)。使用开口设计,其中将光固化Bis-GMA树脂基密封剂与玻璃离子密封剂进行比较。然后将它们随机放置在50对配对的对侧恒牙中,并用秒表记录放置的持续时间。治疗成本通过密封剂套件的成本除以密封咬合面的总数量来计算。使用社会科学统计软件包21.0版进行统计分析,卡方检验用于确定变量。p<0.05的概率值被认为具有统计学意义。结果:使用树脂基密封剂的密封剂处理持续时间为235至446秒(平均时间318.86±55.54秒);而使用玻璃离聚物基密封剂的密封剂处理的持续时间为238-360秒(平均时间292.57+33.56秒);使用树脂密封剂(Clinpro®)密封牙齿表面的成本仅为570奈拉。同样,使用玻璃离聚物基密封剂(GC Fuji triage®)密封牙齿表面的成本仅为840奈拉。结论:使用玻璃离聚物进行密封剂治疗所需的椅旁时间比使用树脂基密封剂进行裂缝密封所需的时间短。与玻璃离聚物基密封胶相比,树脂基裂缝密封胶的使用相对便宜
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of the Duration and Cost of Treatment Between Glass Ionomer and Resin Based Fissure Sealants among Children in Benin City, Nigeria
Background: Dental service utilization in children is reduced as a result of long treatment times and prohibitive cost of treatment. This may result in  an increase in early childhood caries and subsequent premature tooth loss. Fissure sealants are a preventable method in the management of  dental caries but the cost may be a barrier to early treatment. Aim: To compare the duration and cost of sealant treatment between glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants among children in Benin City,Nigeria. Materials and Methods: All occlusal surfaces of the lower permanent first molars (2 teeth each in a total number of 50 children) were sealed andincluded in the study (n=100). A split-mouth design was used in which a light cure Bis-GMA resin-based sealant was compared with a glass-ionomersealant. They were then randomly placed in 50 matched contralateral pairs of permanent first molar teeth and a stop watch used to record the duration of placement. The cost of treatment was calculated by dividing the cost of the sealant kit with the total number of sealed occlusal surfaces. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0 with the chi square test for determination of variables. Probability values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The duration of sealant treatment using resin based sealant ranged from 235 to 446 seconds (mean time 318.86 +55.54 secs); while theduration of sealant treatment using glass ionomer based sealant ranged from 238 to 360 seconds (a mean time 292.57 +33.56 secs); and this wasstatistically significant (P<0.001). The cost of sealing a tooth surface using resin sealant (Clinpro®) was five hundred and seventy naira only. Similarly, the cost of sealing a tooth surface using glass ionomer based sealant (GC Fuji triage®) was eight hundred and forty naira only. Conclusion: Less chairside time is required for sealant treatment using glass ionomer than resin based sealant for fissure sealing procedures. The use of resin based fissure sealant is relatively cheaper when compared with glass ionomer based sealant  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信