{"title":"强调与删减:早期现代英语对种族混合及其后生的态度","authors":"Kyle Grady","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2021.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Early modern English approaches to racial mixing are marked by inconsistency. In this, they find affinity with the approaches of subsequent history, in which the topic of mixedness is subject to divergent, often conflicting, concerns, observations, and theories. In dominant discourse, the topic has historically been—and continues to be—regularly cleaved from historical precedent and present reality, many times in ways that augur otherwise improbable futures. Inconsistency thus offers perhaps the most consistent characteristic through which to chart the trajectory of approaches to racial mixing across time. While we might certainly sketch a broad historical path of dominant approaches to the topic, in practice, beliefs about mixedness regularly emerge and reemerge in ways that complicate and at times contravene what we might envision as the prevailing perspective or historical reality of a given moment.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"52 1","pages":"585 - 604"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emphasis and Elision: Early Modern English Approaches to Racial Mixing and their Afterlives\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Grady\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/nlh.2021.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Early modern English approaches to racial mixing are marked by inconsistency. In this, they find affinity with the approaches of subsequent history, in which the topic of mixedness is subject to divergent, often conflicting, concerns, observations, and theories. In dominant discourse, the topic has historically been—and continues to be—regularly cleaved from historical precedent and present reality, many times in ways that augur otherwise improbable futures. Inconsistency thus offers perhaps the most consistent characteristic through which to chart the trajectory of approaches to racial mixing across time. While we might certainly sketch a broad historical path of dominant approaches to the topic, in practice, beliefs about mixedness regularly emerge and reemerge in ways that complicate and at times contravene what we might envision as the prevailing perspective or historical reality of a given moment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Literary History\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"585 - 604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Literary History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2021.0027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2021.0027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Emphasis and Elision: Early Modern English Approaches to Racial Mixing and their Afterlives
Abstract:Early modern English approaches to racial mixing are marked by inconsistency. In this, they find affinity with the approaches of subsequent history, in which the topic of mixedness is subject to divergent, often conflicting, concerns, observations, and theories. In dominant discourse, the topic has historically been—and continues to be—regularly cleaved from historical precedent and present reality, many times in ways that augur otherwise improbable futures. Inconsistency thus offers perhaps the most consistent characteristic through which to chart the trajectory of approaches to racial mixing across time. While we might certainly sketch a broad historical path of dominant approaches to the topic, in practice, beliefs about mixedness regularly emerge and reemerge in ways that complicate and at times contravene what we might envision as the prevailing perspective or historical reality of a given moment.
期刊介绍:
New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.