狭隘主义、政治与地球

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
H. Ross, Thilak Mallawaarachchi
{"title":"狭隘主义、政治与地球","authors":"H. Ross, Thilak Mallawaarachchi","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2022.2050100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the COP26 international climate negotiations of late 2021, countries settle to the task of meeting their new commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They do so with varying degrees of political commitment and sense of urgency, and the commitments vary widely in ambition and intent. Most countries’ commitments fall very far short of those needed to limit global warming to 1.5 or even two degrees centigrade (UNEP 2021). After COP21 our editors argued that the Paris agreement:","PeriodicalId":46081,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parochialism, politics and the planet\",\"authors\":\"H. Ross, Thilak Mallawaarachchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14486563.2022.2050100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the COP26 international climate negotiations of late 2021, countries settle to the task of meeting their new commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They do so with varying degrees of political commitment and sense of urgency, and the commitments vary widely in ambition and intent. Most countries’ commitments fall very far short of those needed to limit global warming to 1.5 or even two degrees centigrade (UNEP 2021). After COP21 our editors argued that the Paris agreement:\",\"PeriodicalId\":46081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2022.2050100\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2022.2050100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2021年底举行的COP26国际气候谈判之后,各国决心履行其减少温室气体排放的新承诺。他们在这样做的时候有不同程度的政治承诺和紧迫感,而且这些承诺在雄心和意图上差别很大。大多数国家的承诺远远低于将全球变暖限制在1.5摄氏度甚至2摄氏度所需的目标(UNEP 2021)。在COP21之后,我们的编辑认为巴黎协议:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parochialism, politics and the planet
Following the COP26 international climate negotiations of late 2021, countries settle to the task of meeting their new commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. They do so with varying degrees of political commitment and sense of urgency, and the commitments vary widely in ambition and intent. Most countries’ commitments fall very far short of those needed to limit global warming to 1.5 or even two degrees centigrade (UNEP 2021). After COP21 our editors argued that the Paris agreement:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信