土壤中有机碳含量的测定方法(评论)

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
B. Kogut, E. Milanovsky, Sh. A. Hamatnurov
{"title":"土壤中有机碳含量的测定方法(评论)","authors":"B. Kogut, E. Milanovsky, Sh. A. Hamatnurov","doi":"10.19047/0136-1694-2023-114-5-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents theoretical basis of the methods for determining the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) both by direct dry combustion using automated analyzers and indirectly – by I.V. Tyurin and Walkley–Black oxidation. Author's and literature experimental data of SOC analyses in various soils by these methods are presented. Comparative analysis of the above data showed that in some cases the content of SOC determined by oxidability is lower than the one obtained by dry combustion (in most cases), while in others, on the contrary, the content of SOC is higher. This conclusion fully complies with the theoretical views of I.V. Tyurin on the chemical nature of soil organic matter (SOM). A schematic description of determining the content of total (organic) carbon in non-carbonate soils by dry combustion method using automated analyzers Leco (USA) and AH-7529 (Gomel, Belarus) is given. It was pointed out that it is difficult to determine SOC content by dry combustion method with automated analyzers in carbonate soils. For these soils it is recommended to determine the content of inorganic carbon by decomposition of carbonates with HClO4 solution using express analyzer AN-7529. The direct method of determining the content of SOC has the best metrological characteristics compared to ones of the indirect method, which convincingly confirms the authoritative opinions of Schollenberg and Tyurin about the inaccuracy of the latter. It is concluded that the indicators determined by the methods of Tyurin and Walkley–Black and dry combustion are chemically independent, characterizing, respectively, the oxidability and organic carbon content of SOM. It is recommended to use dry combustion method with automated analyzers when monitoring the content and stocks of organic carbon in soils.","PeriodicalId":52755,"journal":{"name":"Biulleten'' Pochvennogo instituta im VV Dokuchaeva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for determining the organic carbon content in soils (critical review)\",\"authors\":\"B. Kogut, E. Milanovsky, Sh. A. Hamatnurov\",\"doi\":\"10.19047/0136-1694-2023-114-5-28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents theoretical basis of the methods for determining the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) both by direct dry combustion using automated analyzers and indirectly – by I.V. Tyurin and Walkley–Black oxidation. Author's and literature experimental data of SOC analyses in various soils by these methods are presented. Comparative analysis of the above data showed that in some cases the content of SOC determined by oxidability is lower than the one obtained by dry combustion (in most cases), while in others, on the contrary, the content of SOC is higher. This conclusion fully complies with the theoretical views of I.V. Tyurin on the chemical nature of soil organic matter (SOM). A schematic description of determining the content of total (organic) carbon in non-carbonate soils by dry combustion method using automated analyzers Leco (USA) and AH-7529 (Gomel, Belarus) is given. It was pointed out that it is difficult to determine SOC content by dry combustion method with automated analyzers in carbonate soils. For these soils it is recommended to determine the content of inorganic carbon by decomposition of carbonates with HClO4 solution using express analyzer AN-7529. The direct method of determining the content of SOC has the best metrological characteristics compared to ones of the indirect method, which convincingly confirms the authoritative opinions of Schollenberg and Tyurin about the inaccuracy of the latter. It is concluded that the indicators determined by the methods of Tyurin and Walkley–Black and dry combustion are chemically independent, characterizing, respectively, the oxidability and organic carbon content of SOM. It is recommended to use dry combustion method with automated analyzers when monitoring the content and stocks of organic carbon in soils.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biulleten'' Pochvennogo instituta im VV Dokuchaeva\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biulleten'' Pochvennogo instituta im VV Dokuchaeva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-114-5-28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biulleten'' Pochvennogo instituta im VV Dokuchaeva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2023-114-5-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了自动分析仪直接干燃烧法测定土壤有机碳(SOC)含量的理论基础,以及间接采用Tyurin和Walkley-Black氧化法测定土壤有机碳含量的方法。本文给出了作者和文献用这些方法分析不同土壤有机碳的实验数据。对上述数据的对比分析表明,在某些情况下,氧化性测定的有机碳含量低于干燃烧测定的有机碳含量(大多数情况下),而在另一些情况下,有机碳含量则更高。这一结论完全符合秋林关于土壤有机质(SOM)化学性质的理论观点。本文介绍了用美国的Leco和白俄罗斯的AH-7529自动分析仪干燃烧法测定非碳酸盐土壤中总(有机)碳含量的方法。指出用自动分析仪进行干燃烧法测定碳酸盐土壤中有机碳含量的困难。对于这些土壤,建议使用AN-7529快速分析仪通过HClO4溶液分解碳酸盐来测定无机碳的含量。与间接法相比,直接法测定有机碳含量具有最好的计量特性,这有力地证实了Schollenberg和Tyurin关于间接法测定有机碳含量不准确的权威观点。结果表明,Tyurin法和Walkley-Black法测定的指标与干燃烧法测定的指标具有化学独立性,分别表征了SOM的氧化性和有机碳含量。在监测土壤中有机碳的含量和储量时,建议使用干燃烧法和自动分析仪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods for determining the organic carbon content in soils (critical review)
The paper presents theoretical basis of the methods for determining the content of soil organic carbon (SOC) both by direct dry combustion using automated analyzers and indirectly – by I.V. Tyurin and Walkley–Black oxidation. Author's and literature experimental data of SOC analyses in various soils by these methods are presented. Comparative analysis of the above data showed that in some cases the content of SOC determined by oxidability is lower than the one obtained by dry combustion (in most cases), while in others, on the contrary, the content of SOC is higher. This conclusion fully complies with the theoretical views of I.V. Tyurin on the chemical nature of soil organic matter (SOM). A schematic description of determining the content of total (organic) carbon in non-carbonate soils by dry combustion method using automated analyzers Leco (USA) and AH-7529 (Gomel, Belarus) is given. It was pointed out that it is difficult to determine SOC content by dry combustion method with automated analyzers in carbonate soils. For these soils it is recommended to determine the content of inorganic carbon by decomposition of carbonates with HClO4 solution using express analyzer AN-7529. The direct method of determining the content of SOC has the best metrological characteristics compared to ones of the indirect method, which convincingly confirms the authoritative opinions of Schollenberg and Tyurin about the inaccuracy of the latter. It is concluded that the indicators determined by the methods of Tyurin and Walkley–Black and dry combustion are chemically independent, characterizing, respectively, the oxidability and organic carbon content of SOM. It is recommended to use dry combustion method with automated analyzers when monitoring the content and stocks of organic carbon in soils.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信