重症监护病房患者口腔卫生规程

Bianca Da Silva Reginato, Felipe Gomes Dallepiane, Daniela Jorge Corralo
{"title":"重症监护病房患者口腔卫生规程","authors":"Bianca Da Silva Reginato, Felipe Gomes Dallepiane, Daniela Jorge Corralo","doi":"10.17695/rcsne.vol21.n1.p131-141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This literature review aimed I'm verify which are the most effective hygiene protocols and oral antiseptics in reducing or preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). A search for related articles was carried out in the pubmed and science databases , selecting by title , abstract and full text , excluding those whose theme was not in accordance with the research objective . it was found that although there are several ways I'm control biofilm , there is still no established protocol for oral hygiene of patients study mechanical ventilation , having identified different methods including the use of various antiseptic products , such as chlorhexidine 0.12, 0.2 and 2%, associated or not with a mechanical method of biofilm removal . In some protocols , the use of more than one substance is suggested , such as hydrogen peroxide, associated with cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine . However , more comprehensive protocols , involving measures other than mechanical and pharmacological methods , proved I'm be more efficient in preventing and reducing VAP. antiseptics are very important for reducing the rate of this infection , although several substances have been tested , chlorhexidine gluconate is the most indicate by the authors .","PeriodicalId":34423,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Ciencias da Saude Nova Esperanca","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ORAL HYGIENE PROTOCOLS FOR PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Da Silva Reginato, Felipe Gomes Dallepiane, Daniela Jorge Corralo\",\"doi\":\"10.17695/rcsne.vol21.n1.p131-141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This literature review aimed I'm verify which are the most effective hygiene protocols and oral antiseptics in reducing or preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). A search for related articles was carried out in the pubmed and science databases , selecting by title , abstract and full text , excluding those whose theme was not in accordance with the research objective . it was found that although there are several ways I'm control biofilm , there is still no established protocol for oral hygiene of patients study mechanical ventilation , having identified different methods including the use of various antiseptic products , such as chlorhexidine 0.12, 0.2 and 2%, associated or not with a mechanical method of biofilm removal . In some protocols , the use of more than one substance is suggested , such as hydrogen peroxide, associated with cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine . However , more comprehensive protocols , involving measures other than mechanical and pharmacological methods , proved I'm be more efficient in preventing and reducing VAP. antiseptics are very important for reducing the rate of this infection , although several substances have been tested , chlorhexidine gluconate is the most indicate by the authors .\",\"PeriodicalId\":34423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Ciencias da Saude Nova Esperanca\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Ciencias da Saude Nova Esperanca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17695/rcsne.vol21.n1.p131-141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Ciencias da Saude Nova Esperanca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17695/rcsne.vol21.n1.p131-141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文献综述旨在验证哪些是减少或预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)最有效的卫生方案和口腔防腐剂。在公共和科学数据库中搜索相关文章,按标题、摘要和全文进行选择,不包括主题与研究目标不一致的文章。研究发现,尽管我有几种控制生物膜的方法,但仍然没有建立用于患者口腔卫生的研究机械通气的方案,已经确定了不同的方法,包括使用各种防腐剂,如0.12、0.2%和2%的氯己定,与去除生物膜的机械方法相关或不相关。在一些方案中,建议使用一种以上的物质,如过氧化氢,与氯化十六烷基吡啶或氯己定有关。然而,更全面的方案,包括机械和药理学方法以外的措施,证明我在预防和减少VAP方面更有效。防腐剂对于降低这种感染率非常重要,尽管已经测试了几种物质,但作者认为葡萄糖酸氯己定是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ORAL HYGIENE PROTOCOLS FOR PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
This literature review aimed I'm verify which are the most effective hygiene protocols and oral antiseptics in reducing or preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). A search for related articles was carried out in the pubmed and science databases , selecting by title , abstract and full text , excluding those whose theme was not in accordance with the research objective . it was found that although there are several ways I'm control biofilm , there is still no established protocol for oral hygiene of patients study mechanical ventilation , having identified different methods including the use of various antiseptic products , such as chlorhexidine 0.12, 0.2 and 2%, associated or not with a mechanical method of biofilm removal . In some protocols , the use of more than one substance is suggested , such as hydrogen peroxide, associated with cetylpyridinium chloride or chlorhexidine . However , more comprehensive protocols , involving measures other than mechanical and pharmacological methods , proved I'm be more efficient in preventing and reducing VAP. antiseptics are very important for reducing the rate of this infection , although several substances have been tested , chlorhexidine gluconate is the most indicate by the authors .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信