普通肝素(UFH)和磺达肝素对新冠肺炎高凝患者血小板和D-二聚体水平的比较

IF 0.4 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Meity Ardiana, H. Hermawan, P. M. Harsoyo, I. Sufiyah, M. Fanani
{"title":"普通肝素(UFH)和磺达肝素对新冠肺炎高凝患者血小板和D-二聚体水平的比较","authors":"Meity Ardiana, H. Hermawan, P. M. Harsoyo, I. Sufiyah, M. Fanani","doi":"10.5603/aa.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to compare the clinical effects between UFH and fondaparinux in COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation. Material(s) and Method(s): This was a prospective cohort study. Samples were taken consecutively from hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation who received UFH or fondaparinux based on the standardized guidelines. A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated for platelet and D-dimer values before and after administration of UFH or fondaparinux. Result(s): Although there was no difference in D-dimer reduction between the two groups (p = 0.44), fondaparinux showed a greater reduction, 26% against 22% for UFH. While on platelets, there was a significant difference (p = 0.04) between fondaparinux and UFH. Fondaparinux showed a reduced thrombocytopenia impact, as seen by an increase in pre-and post-therapy platelets of up to 50%, compared to 16% in UFH. In regard to the incidence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), there was no significant difference between post-UFH therapy and post-fondaparinux therapy (p = 0.361). Conclusion(s): Fondaparinux did not reduce platelet levels as much as UFH, but there was no difference between the fondaparinux group compared to the UFH group in the effect of decreasing D-dimer levels and the sign of HIT. Copyright © 2022 Via Medica.","PeriodicalId":41754,"journal":{"name":"Acta Angiologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between unfractionated heparin (UFH) and fondaparinux on platelets and D-dimer level in COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation\",\"authors\":\"Meity Ardiana, H. Hermawan, P. M. Harsoyo, I. Sufiyah, M. Fanani\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/aa.2022.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study aimed to compare the clinical effects between UFH and fondaparinux in COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation. Material(s) and Method(s): This was a prospective cohort study. Samples were taken consecutively from hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation who received UFH or fondaparinux based on the standardized guidelines. A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated for platelet and D-dimer values before and after administration of UFH or fondaparinux. Result(s): Although there was no difference in D-dimer reduction between the two groups (p = 0.44), fondaparinux showed a greater reduction, 26% against 22% for UFH. While on platelets, there was a significant difference (p = 0.04) between fondaparinux and UFH. Fondaparinux showed a reduced thrombocytopenia impact, as seen by an increase in pre-and post-therapy platelets of up to 50%, compared to 16% in UFH. In regard to the incidence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), there was no significant difference between post-UFH therapy and post-fondaparinux therapy (p = 0.361). Conclusion(s): Fondaparinux did not reduce platelet levels as much as UFH, but there was no difference between the fondaparinux group compared to the UFH group in the effect of decreasing D-dimer levels and the sign of HIT. Copyright © 2022 Via Medica.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Angiologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Angiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2022.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Angiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2022.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究旨在比较UFH与fondaparinux治疗COVID-19高凝患者的临床效果。材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究。根据标准化指南连续采集住院的COVID-19高凝患者接受UFH或fondaparinux的样本。共有71例患者符合纳入标准。在给予UFH或fondaparinux前后评估患者的血小板和d -二聚体值。结果:虽然两组之间d -二聚体的减少没有差异(p = 0.44),但fondaparinux显示出更大的减少,26%对22% UFH。而在血小板方面,fondaparinux和UFH之间有显著差异(p = 0.04)。Fondaparinux显示减少血小板减少的影响,治疗前和治疗后血小板增加高达50%,而UFH为16%。在肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)发生率方面,ufh治疗后与fondaparinux治疗后无显著差异(p = 0.361)。结论:Fondaparinux降低血小板水平的效果不如UFH,但在降低d -二聚体水平和HIT体征方面,Fondaparinux组与UFH组比较无差异。版权所有©2022 Via Medica
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between unfractionated heparin (UFH) and fondaparinux on platelets and D-dimer level in COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the clinical effects between UFH and fondaparinux in COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation. Material(s) and Method(s): This was a prospective cohort study. Samples were taken consecutively from hospitalized COVID-19 patients with hypercoagulation who received UFH or fondaparinux based on the standardized guidelines. A total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were evaluated for platelet and D-dimer values before and after administration of UFH or fondaparinux. Result(s): Although there was no difference in D-dimer reduction between the two groups (p = 0.44), fondaparinux showed a greater reduction, 26% against 22% for UFH. While on platelets, there was a significant difference (p = 0.04) between fondaparinux and UFH. Fondaparinux showed a reduced thrombocytopenia impact, as seen by an increase in pre-and post-therapy platelets of up to 50%, compared to 16% in UFH. In regard to the incidence of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), there was no significant difference between post-UFH therapy and post-fondaparinux therapy (p = 0.361). Conclusion(s): Fondaparinux did not reduce platelet levels as much as UFH, but there was no difference between the fondaparinux group compared to the UFH group in the effect of decreasing D-dimer levels and the sign of HIT. Copyright © 2022 Via Medica.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Angiologica
Acta Angiologica PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Angiologica is a bilingual (Polish/English) quarterly for angiologists and vascular surgeons as well as for other doctors interested in vascular disorders. Original papers, reviews, case reports and letters submitted by authors from different countries, concerning physiology, pathology, presentation, diagnostics and treatment of vascular system, are published. Thorough contents of Acta Angiologica provide valuable information about modern diagnostic and therapeutic issues as well as advances in basic sciences and pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信