通过回顾来展望未来:布兰代斯在惠特尼诉加州案中的一致意见和通信法学术的未来

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
A. Sanders
{"title":"通过回顾来展望未来:布兰代斯在惠特尼诉加州案中的一致意见和通信法学术的未来","authors":"A. Sanders","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking Forward by Looking Backward: Brandeis’ Concurrence in Whitney v. California and the Future of Communication Law Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"A. Sanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第一次世界大战后的十年里,美国最高法院裁决了一些有影响力的案件,涉及直言不讳的演讲者,他们的观点往往不受欢迎。在这种背景下,大法官路易斯·布兰代斯提出了公民勇气,即公开讨论重要问题是一种政治责任,即使这些观点与现状背道而驰。运用他的方法,本文呼吁我们最知名的传播法学者,声称他们有责任推动我们的领域和我们的奖学金向前发展。它概述了我们必须进行深刻变革的四个领域,以确保我们学术的智力活力,并有意义地致力于多样性和包容性。就其性质而言,我们的领域必须是一个欢迎积极交流思想和观点的领域。抛弃第一修正案例外论的古板规范和传统的通信法思维已经是过去的事了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Looking Forward by Looking Backward: Brandeis’ Concurrence in Whitney v. California and the Future of Communication Law Scholarship
In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The societal, cultural, economic and political dimensions of communication, including the freedoms of speech and press, are undergoing dramatic global changes. The convergence of the mass media, telecommunications, and computers has raised important questions reflected in analyses of modern communication law, policy, and regulation. Serving as a forum for discussions of these continuing and emerging questions, Communication Law and Policy considers traditional and contemporary problems of freedom of expression and dissemination, including theoretical, conceptual and methodological issues inherent in the special conditions presented by new media and information technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信