亚利桑那电池对希腊单语认知障碍患者痴呆沟通障碍的验证研究

Q4 Neuroscience
D. Tafiadis, Louiza Voniati, Alexandra Prentza, Vasiliki Zarokanellou, V. Siafaka, Nafsika Ziavra, S. Konitsiotis
{"title":"亚利桑那电池对希腊单语认知障碍患者痴呆沟通障碍的验证研究","authors":"D. Tafiadis, Louiza Voniati, Alexandra Prentza, Vasiliki Zarokanellou, V. Siafaka, Nafsika Ziavra, S. Konitsiotis","doi":"10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i2.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of cognitive-communication disorders is performed with several types of assessment methods. These methods include different types of cognitive and language tests such as the Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia (ABCD). The present study aimed to validate the ABCD in the Greek language. 132 individuals participated in the study: 60 adults in cognitive health (ACH) and 72 patients [24 Parkinson Disease (PD) patients without cognitive impairment, 24 with Parkinson Disease Dementia (PDD) and 24 with Alzheimer's Disease (AD)]. The cognitive and mental status of all participants was estimated by means of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (H-NPI) the Geriatric Depression Scale -15 (GDS-15) and the ABCD. Statistically significant differences were found between all tests administered with the PDD and AD patients having the lower scores. The ABCD showed good psychometric properties, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0. 901) and discriminatory ability. It was significantly correlated with the AMTS, CDT, IADL, and MMSE.The Greek version of the ABCD demonstrated good validity, sensitivity, and discriminatory ability. The ABCD is a valuable instrument to assess cognitive-communication dis-orders.","PeriodicalId":36108,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research Notes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation study of Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia in Greek monolingual cognitively impaired patients\",\"authors\":\"D. Tafiadis, Louiza Voniati, Alexandra Prentza, Vasiliki Zarokanellou, V. Siafaka, Nafsika Ziavra, S. Konitsiotis\",\"doi\":\"10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i2.182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation of cognitive-communication disorders is performed with several types of assessment methods. These methods include different types of cognitive and language tests such as the Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia (ABCD). The present study aimed to validate the ABCD in the Greek language. 132 individuals participated in the study: 60 adults in cognitive health (ACH) and 72 patients [24 Parkinson Disease (PD) patients without cognitive impairment, 24 with Parkinson Disease Dementia (PDD) and 24 with Alzheimer's Disease (AD)]. The cognitive and mental status of all participants was estimated by means of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (H-NPI) the Geriatric Depression Scale -15 (GDS-15) and the ABCD. Statistically significant differences were found between all tests administered with the PDD and AD patients having the lower scores. The ABCD showed good psychometric properties, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0. 901) and discriminatory ability. It was significantly correlated with the AMTS, CDT, IADL, and MMSE.The Greek version of the ABCD demonstrated good validity, sensitivity, and discriminatory ability. The ABCD is a valuable instrument to assess cognitive-communication dis-orders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience Research Notes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience Research Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i2.182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31117/neuroscirn.v6i2.182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知交流障碍的评估采用几种类型的评估方法。这些方法包括不同类型的认知和语言测试,如亚利桑那州痴呆症沟通障碍测试(ABCD)。本研究旨在验证希腊语中的ABCD。132人参与了这项研究:60名认知健康(ACH)成年人和72名患者[24名无认知障碍的帕金森病(PD)患者,24名患有帕金森病痴呆症(PDD)患者和24名患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者]。所有参与者的认知和精神状态通过迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)、简略精神测试分数(AMTS)、时钟绘制测试(CDT)、日常生活工具活动(IADL)、神经精神量表(H-NPI)、老年抑郁症量表-15(GDS-15)和ABCD进行评估。在用PDD进行的所有测试和得分较低的AD患者之间发现了统计学上的显著差异。ABCD表现出良好的心理测量特性和内部一致性(Cronbachα=0。901)和辨别能力。ABCD与AMTS、CDT、IADL和MMSE显著相关。希腊版ABCD显示出良好的有效性、敏感性和辨别能力。ABCD是评估认知沟通障碍的一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation study of Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia in Greek monolingual cognitively impaired patients
The evaluation of cognitive-communication disorders is performed with several types of assessment methods. These methods include different types of cognitive and language tests such as the Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia (ABCD). The present study aimed to validate the ABCD in the Greek language. 132 individuals participated in the study: 60 adults in cognitive health (ACH) and 72 patients [24 Parkinson Disease (PD) patients without cognitive impairment, 24 with Parkinson Disease Dementia (PDD) and 24 with Alzheimer's Disease (AD)]. The cognitive and mental status of all participants was estimated by means of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (H-NPI) the Geriatric Depression Scale -15 (GDS-15) and the ABCD. Statistically significant differences were found between all tests administered with the PDD and AD patients having the lower scores. The ABCD showed good psychometric properties, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha=0. 901) and discriminatory ability. It was significantly correlated with the AMTS, CDT, IADL, and MMSE.The Greek version of the ABCD demonstrated good validity, sensitivity, and discriminatory ability. The ABCD is a valuable instrument to assess cognitive-communication dis-orders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience Research Notes
Neuroscience Research Notes Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信