影响因子作为科学知识的合法性产生:文献综述

Q4 Social Sciences
Janus.net Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.3
T. Quintanilha, Gustavo Cardoso
{"title":"影响因子作为科学知识的合法性产生:文献综述","authors":"T. Quintanilha, Gustavo Cardoso","doi":"10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact factor (IF) is perceived by all researchers and scientists as the main criterion in their publication strategies, in order to respond to the demands of the academic reward system that defines career progression and the allocation of funds for research. Through a review of published literature we aim to explore different limits and ranges associated with impact factor, according to academia. We also try to understand in which way the state of the art is evolving, as well as the features that point to ambiguous criteria inherent to the construct on which impact factor was established as the legitimising criteria of scientific knowledge production.","PeriodicalId":38150,"journal":{"name":"Janus.net","volume":"9 1","pages":"32-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact factor as a legitimator of the scientific knowledge produced: a review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"T. Quintanilha, Gustavo Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The impact factor (IF) is perceived by all researchers and scientists as the main criterion in their publication strategies, in order to respond to the demands of the academic reward system that defines career progression and the allocation of funds for research. Through a review of published literature we aim to explore different limits and ranges associated with impact factor, according to academia. We also try to understand in which way the state of the art is evolving, as well as the features that point to ambiguous criteria inherent to the construct on which impact factor was established as the legitimising criteria of scientific knowledge production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Janus.net\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"32-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Janus.net\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Janus.net","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.9.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

影响因子(IF)被所有研究人员和科学家视为其发表策略的主要标准,以响应定义职业发展和研究资金分配的学术奖励系统的要求。根据学术界的说法,通过对已发表文献的回顾,我们旨在探索与影响因子相关的不同限制和范围。我们还试图了解技术发展的方式,以及指向模糊标准的特征,这些标准是建立在影响因子作为科学知识生产合法化标准的基础上的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact factor as a legitimator of the scientific knowledge produced: a review of the literature
The impact factor (IF) is perceived by all researchers and scientists as the main criterion in their publication strategies, in order to respond to the demands of the academic reward system that defines career progression and the allocation of funds for research. Through a review of published literature we aim to explore different limits and ranges associated with impact factor, according to academia. We also try to understand in which way the state of the art is evolving, as well as the features that point to ambiguous criteria inherent to the construct on which impact factor was established as the legitimising criteria of scientific knowledge production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Janus.net
Janus.net Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信