根据《民法典》和《破产法》缩短债权人的法律行为的可反对性——程序方面

Q4 Social Sciences
Petr Smolík
{"title":"根据《民法典》和《破产法》缩短债权人的法律行为的可反对性——程序方面","authors":"Petr Smolík","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2022.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the new regulation of the relative ineffectiveness of legal acts in the Civil Code and compares it with the special regulation of the ineffectiveness of legal acts of the debtor in the Insolvency Act, which was adopted several years earlier. The basis of the treatise is the substantive legal regulation of the institute, but due to its nature, the procedural aspects – the so-called voidability – cannot be separated from the substantive aspects. The interpretation therefore focuses on the procedure of creditors towards the debtor or third parties when applying relative ineffectiveness and focuses on avoidance actions (both general and special), which are the basic instrument of the legal protection of creditors. With regard to the above-mentioned double regulation there are also problems in practice when both variants occur concurrently. A specific problem is also represented by the clash of the relative ineffectiveness of a legal act with its invalidity and its resolution especially in the area of insolvency law.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Odporovatelnost právních jednání zkracujících věřitele dle občanského zákoníku a insolvenčního zákona – procesní aspekty\",\"authors\":\"Petr Smolík\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366478.2022.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with the new regulation of the relative ineffectiveness of legal acts in the Civil Code and compares it with the special regulation of the ineffectiveness of legal acts of the debtor in the Insolvency Act, which was adopted several years earlier. The basis of the treatise is the substantive legal regulation of the institute, but due to its nature, the procedural aspects – the so-called voidability – cannot be separated from the substantive aspects. The interpretation therefore focuses on the procedure of creditors towards the debtor or third parties when applying relative ineffectiveness and focuses on avoidance actions (both general and special), which are the basic instrument of the legal protection of creditors. With regard to the above-mentioned double regulation there are also problems in practice when both variants occur concurrently. A specific problem is also represented by the clash of the relative ineffectiveness of a legal act with its invalidity and its resolution especially in the area of insolvency law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了《民法典》对法律行为相对无效性的新规定,并将其与几年前通过的《破产法》对债务人法律行为无效性的特别规定进行了比较。该论文的基础是该机构的实体法律规定,但由于其性质,程序方面——即所谓的可撤销性——不能与实体方面分开。因此,解释侧重于债权人在适用相对无效性时对债务人或第三方的程序,并侧重于撤销诉讼(一般和特别),这是对债权人的法律保护的基本文书。关于上述双重监管,当两种变体同时发生时,在实践中也存在问题。一个具体问题还表现为法律行为的相对无效性与其无效性及其解决之间的冲突,特别是在破产法领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Odporovatelnost právních jednání zkracujících věřitele dle občanského zákoníku a insolvenčního zákona – procesní aspekty
The paper deals with the new regulation of the relative ineffectiveness of legal acts in the Civil Code and compares it with the special regulation of the ineffectiveness of legal acts of the debtor in the Insolvency Act, which was adopted several years earlier. The basis of the treatise is the substantive legal regulation of the institute, but due to its nature, the procedural aspects – the so-called voidability – cannot be separated from the substantive aspects. The interpretation therefore focuses on the procedure of creditors towards the debtor or third parties when applying relative ineffectiveness and focuses on avoidance actions (both general and special), which are the basic instrument of the legal protection of creditors. With regard to the above-mentioned double regulation there are also problems in practice when both variants occur concurrently. A specific problem is also represented by the clash of the relative ineffectiveness of a legal act with its invalidity and its resolution especially in the area of insolvency law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信