南非专业人员与发展性阅读障碍:知识、需求和观点

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Annika Altin, Salome Geertsema, M. le Roux, M. Graham
{"title":"南非专业人员与发展性阅读障碍:知识、需求和观点","authors":"Annika Altin, Salome Geertsema, M. le Roux, M. Graham","doi":"10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite extensive research on the specific learning disorder (developmental dyslexia) – SLD (DD), many fallacies still cause confusion amongst professionals worldwide. These myths involve the characteristics, diagnoses and treatment of SLD (DD) and should be eradicated.Aim: The authors aimed to determine the knowledge, needs and perspectives of South African professionals working with children with SLD (DD).Setting: A mixed-methods research design was implemented.Methods: A survey study was carried out and a sample of 108 respondents was obtained. The respondents include speech–language therapists (SLTs), occupational therapists (OTs) and psychologists.Results: Speech–language therapists and psychologists displayed better knowledge about the facts of SLD (DD), compared to OTs. Their knowledge levels were, however, not significantly affected by existing misconceptions surrounding the condition. The fallacy that SLD (DD) is caused by a visual impairment is still believed. An investigation into the professionals’ perspectives regarding the identification of SLD (DD) suggested that South African psychologists were the most confident of their ability to identify characteristics. Nonetheless, all professionals reported not being convinced of their ability to provide a differential diagnosis of the disorder. Statements regarding management highlighted the uncertainties about the importance of addressing phonological awareness skills in treatment. Additional training needs were also identified as SLTs, OTs and psychologists generally feel unprepared to assess and treat SLD (DD).Conclusion: The differences identified amongst professional groups were related to the knowledge of the facts and characteristics of SLD (DD) and the ability to identify and manage the condition. Additional training needs should be addressed.Contribution: The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the NRF for partially funding the publication of this article.","PeriodicalId":55958,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"South African professionals and developmental dyslexia: Knowledge, needs and perspective\",\"authors\":\"Annika Altin, Salome Geertsema, M. le Roux, M. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Despite extensive research on the specific learning disorder (developmental dyslexia) – SLD (DD), many fallacies still cause confusion amongst professionals worldwide. These myths involve the characteristics, diagnoses and treatment of SLD (DD) and should be eradicated.Aim: The authors aimed to determine the knowledge, needs and perspectives of South African professionals working with children with SLD (DD).Setting: A mixed-methods research design was implemented.Methods: A survey study was carried out and a sample of 108 respondents was obtained. The respondents include speech–language therapists (SLTs), occupational therapists (OTs) and psychologists.Results: Speech–language therapists and psychologists displayed better knowledge about the facts of SLD (DD), compared to OTs. Their knowledge levels were, however, not significantly affected by existing misconceptions surrounding the condition. The fallacy that SLD (DD) is caused by a visual impairment is still believed. An investigation into the professionals’ perspectives regarding the identification of SLD (DD) suggested that South African psychologists were the most confident of their ability to identify characteristics. Nonetheless, all professionals reported not being convinced of their ability to provide a differential diagnosis of the disorder. Statements regarding management highlighted the uncertainties about the importance of addressing phonological awareness skills in treatment. Additional training needs were also identified as SLTs, OTs and psychologists generally feel unprepared to assess and treat SLD (DD).Conclusion: The differences identified amongst professional groups were related to the knowledge of the facts and characteristics of SLD (DD) and the ability to identify and manage the condition. Additional training needs should be addressed.Contribution: The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the NRF for partially funding the publication of this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Childhood Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Childhood Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管对特定的学习障碍(发展性阅读障碍)——SLD(DD)进行了广泛的研究,但许多谬论仍然在世界各地的专业人士中引起困惑。这些神话涉及SLD(DD)的特征、诊断和治疗,应该根除。目的:作者旨在确定从事SLD(DD)儿童工作的南非专业人员的知识、需求和观点。背景:实施混合方法研究设计。方法:采用问卷调查方法,抽取108名被调查者作为调查对象。受访者包括言语治疗师、职业治疗师和心理学家。结果:与OT相比,言语治疗师和心理学家对SLD(DD)的事实表现出更好的了解。然而,他们的知识水平并没有受到围绕这种情况的现有误解的显著影响。SLD(DD)是由视觉障碍引起的谬论仍然被认为。对专业人士对SLD(DD)识别的看法进行的调查表明,南非心理学家对自己识别特征的能力最有信心。尽管如此,所有专业人员都报告说,他们不相信自己有能力对这种疾病进行鉴别诊断。关于管理的声明强调了在治疗中解决语音意识技能重要性的不确定性。额外的培训需求也被确定为SLT、OT和心理学家通常对评估和治疗SLD(DD)没有准备。结论:专业群体之间发现的差异与对SLD事实和特征的了解以及识别和管理病情的能力有关。应满足额外的培训需求。贡献:作者感谢NRF为本文的发表提供部分资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
South African professionals and developmental dyslexia: Knowledge, needs and perspective
Background: Despite extensive research on the specific learning disorder (developmental dyslexia) – SLD (DD), many fallacies still cause confusion amongst professionals worldwide. These myths involve the characteristics, diagnoses and treatment of SLD (DD) and should be eradicated.Aim: The authors aimed to determine the knowledge, needs and perspectives of South African professionals working with children with SLD (DD).Setting: A mixed-methods research design was implemented.Methods: A survey study was carried out and a sample of 108 respondents was obtained. The respondents include speech–language therapists (SLTs), occupational therapists (OTs) and psychologists.Results: Speech–language therapists and psychologists displayed better knowledge about the facts of SLD (DD), compared to OTs. Their knowledge levels were, however, not significantly affected by existing misconceptions surrounding the condition. The fallacy that SLD (DD) is caused by a visual impairment is still believed. An investigation into the professionals’ perspectives regarding the identification of SLD (DD) suggested that South African psychologists were the most confident of their ability to identify characteristics. Nonetheless, all professionals reported not being convinced of their ability to provide a differential diagnosis of the disorder. Statements regarding management highlighted the uncertainties about the importance of addressing phonological awareness skills in treatment. Additional training needs were also identified as SLTs, OTs and psychologists generally feel unprepared to assess and treat SLD (DD).Conclusion: The differences identified amongst professional groups were related to the knowledge of the facts and characteristics of SLD (DD) and the ability to identify and manage the condition. Additional training needs should be addressed.Contribution: The authors would like to acknowledge and thank the NRF for partially funding the publication of this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Childhood Education
South African Journal of Childhood Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信