书评:美国集中营法的兴衰:从实习到麦卡锡主义和激进的20世纪60年代的公民自由辩论

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Jennifer R. Ballengee
{"title":"书评:美国集中营法的兴衰:从实习到麦卡锡主义和激进的20世纪60年代的公民自由辩论","authors":"Jennifer R. Ballengee","doi":"10.1177/1743872120970871a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the end, I would argue that one’s preference for McManus’s approach to liberalism over liberal egalitarianism, broadly understood, hinges on whether one thinks the workplace, the family, and other private institutions require democratizing (a process which, as mentioned above, remains somewhat opaque.) This reader would be willing to consider the workplace, but thinks that democratizing the rest (to the extent that this entails top-down state-sanctioned action) may well do more harm than good. Thus, I do not yet see a reason to shift allegiances. And yet, while I remain to be convinced, I cannot deny that McManus’s ambitious book deserves to be widely read and discussed.","PeriodicalId":43886,"journal":{"name":"Law Culture and the Humanities","volume":"17 1","pages":"643 - 646"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: The Rise and Fall of America’s Concentration Camps Law: Civil Liberties Debates from the Internment to McCarthyism and the Radical 1960s\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer R. Ballengee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1743872120970871a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the end, I would argue that one’s preference for McManus’s approach to liberalism over liberal egalitarianism, broadly understood, hinges on whether one thinks the workplace, the family, and other private institutions require democratizing (a process which, as mentioned above, remains somewhat opaque.) This reader would be willing to consider the workplace, but thinks that democratizing the rest (to the extent that this entails top-down state-sanctioned action) may well do more harm than good. Thus, I do not yet see a reason to shift allegiances. And yet, while I remain to be convinced, I cannot deny that McManus’s ambitious book deserves to be widely read and discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Culture and the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"643 - 646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Culture and the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872120970871a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Culture and the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872120970871a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最后,我想说,一个人对麦克马纳斯的自由主义方法的偏好,而不是自由的平均主义,广泛理解,取决于一个人是否认为工作场所,家庭和其他私人机构需要民主化(一个过程,如上所述,仍然有些不透明)。这位读者愿意考虑工作场所,但认为将其他领域民主化(在某种程度上,这需要自上而下的国家批准行动)可能弊大于利。因此,我还没有看到改变忠诚的理由。然而,尽管我仍然深信不疑,但我不能否认,麦克马纳斯这本雄心勃勃的书值得广泛阅读和讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: The Rise and Fall of America’s Concentration Camps Law: Civil Liberties Debates from the Internment to McCarthyism and the Radical 1960s
In the end, I would argue that one’s preference for McManus’s approach to liberalism over liberal egalitarianism, broadly understood, hinges on whether one thinks the workplace, the family, and other private institutions require democratizing (a process which, as mentioned above, remains somewhat opaque.) This reader would be willing to consider the workplace, but thinks that democratizing the rest (to the extent that this entails top-down state-sanctioned action) may well do more harm than good. Thus, I do not yet see a reason to shift allegiances. And yet, while I remain to be convinced, I cannot deny that McManus’s ambitious book deserves to be widely read and discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Our mission is to publish high quality work at the intersection of scholarship on law, culture, and the humanities. All commentaries, articles and review essays are peer reviewed. We provide a publishing vehicle for scholars engaged in interdisciplinary, humanistically oriented legal scholarship. We publish a wide range of scholarship in legal history, legal theory and jurisprudence, law and cultural studies, law and literature, and legal hermeneutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信