疫情时期的社会服务——分析德国福利国家保护其基本社会基础设施的措施

P. Kaps, Renate Reiter, Frank Oschmiansky, Sandra Popp, Julia Berthold
{"title":"疫情时期的社会服务——分析德国福利国家保护其基本社会基础设施的措施","authors":"P. Kaps, Renate Reiter, Frank Oschmiansky, Sandra Popp, Julia Berthold","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article examines how the German welfare state has been responding to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. On the basis of various fields of social services, it asks how non-governmental social service providers adapted their services to the situation to keep them accessible for citizens. Moreover, it analyses under which conditions they were able to access and use the support instruments provided by different levels of government during the pandemic. The article applies a theoretical framework from implementation and evaluation research. Using empirical findings from three forms of social services (individual counselling, services in the form of group measures and assisted living) it examines comparatively which factors filter service providers’ access to welfare state support instruments in the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"68 1","pages":"58 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social services in times of pandemic – Analysing the German welfare state's measures to safeguard its basic social infrastructure\",\"authors\":\"P. Kaps, Renate Reiter, Frank Oschmiansky, Sandra Popp, Julia Berthold\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zsr-2022-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The article examines how the German welfare state has been responding to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. On the basis of various fields of social services, it asks how non-governmental social service providers adapted their services to the situation to keep them accessible for citizens. Moreover, it analyses under which conditions they were able to access and use the support instruments provided by different levels of government during the pandemic. The article applies a theoretical framework from implementation and evaluation research. Using empirical findings from three forms of social services (individual counselling, services in the form of group measures and assisted living) it examines comparatively which factors filter service providers’ access to welfare state support instruments in the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"58 - 84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2022-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2022-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了德国福利国家如何应对新冠肺炎大流行的挑战。根据社会服务的各个领域,它询问非政府社会服务提供者如何根据情况调整其服务,以使公民能够获得这些服务。此外,它还分析了在疫情期间,他们在何种条件下能够获得和使用各级政府提供的支持工具。本文运用了实施与评价研究的理论框架。利用三种形式的社会服务(个人咨询、团体测量形式的服务和辅助生活)的实证结果,它比较研究了哪些因素在疫情中过滤了服务提供者获得福利国家支持工具的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social services in times of pandemic – Analysing the German welfare state's measures to safeguard its basic social infrastructure
Abstract The article examines how the German welfare state has been responding to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. On the basis of various fields of social services, it asks how non-governmental social service providers adapted their services to the situation to keep them accessible for citizens. Moreover, it analyses under which conditions they were able to access and use the support instruments provided by different levels of government during the pandemic. The article applies a theoretical framework from implementation and evaluation research. Using empirical findings from three forms of social services (individual counselling, services in the form of group measures and assisted living) it examines comparatively which factors filter service providers’ access to welfare state support instruments in the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信