谈判中的辅助理性转换

Q4 Engineering
Weronika Nieciecka, T. Szapiro
{"title":"谈判中的辅助理性转换","authors":"Weronika Nieciecka, T. Szapiro","doi":"10.2478/candc-2021-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The text attempts to provide a comprehensive outlook on negotiation processes and support procedures, by deriving a mathematical description based on psychological and managerial context. The authors merge psychological and formal descriptions of the principles underlying the perception of rationality in negotiation problems. The framework allows for explaining the violation of perceived rationality as a result of the deprivation of human needs. The argument, supported by pilot experiments, allows for recommending a procedural approach to negotiation, focused on monitoring perceptions of rationality of proposal submission. The paper is concluded with an attempt to foresight further developments of theoretical investigations and expansion of application fields.","PeriodicalId":55209,"journal":{"name":"Control and Cybernetics","volume":"50 1","pages":"127 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards assisted rationality switching in negotiations\",\"authors\":\"Weronika Nieciecka, T. Szapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/candc-2021-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The text attempts to provide a comprehensive outlook on negotiation processes and support procedures, by deriving a mathematical description based on psychological and managerial context. The authors merge psychological and formal descriptions of the principles underlying the perception of rationality in negotiation problems. The framework allows for explaining the violation of perceived rationality as a result of the deprivation of human needs. The argument, supported by pilot experiments, allows for recommending a procedural approach to negotiation, focused on monitoring perceptions of rationality of proposal submission. The paper is concluded with an attempt to foresight further developments of theoretical investigations and expansion of application fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control and Cybernetics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"127 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control and Cybernetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/candc-2021-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/candc-2021-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文试图通过基于心理和管理背景的数学描述,对谈判过程和支持程序进行全面的展望。作者将谈判问题中理性感知的基本原则的心理学和形式描述相结合。该框架允许解释由于剥夺人类需求而导致的对感知理性的侵犯。这一论点得到了试点实验的支持,可以建议采用程序性谈判方法,重点是监测对提案提交合理性的看法。最后,本文试图展望理论研究的进一步发展和应用领域的扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards assisted rationality switching in negotiations
Abstract The text attempts to provide a comprehensive outlook on negotiation processes and support procedures, by deriving a mathematical description based on psychological and managerial context. The authors merge psychological and formal descriptions of the principles underlying the perception of rationality in negotiation problems. The framework allows for explaining the violation of perceived rationality as a result of the deprivation of human needs. The argument, supported by pilot experiments, allows for recommending a procedural approach to negotiation, focused on monitoring perceptions of rationality of proposal submission. The paper is concluded with an attempt to foresight further developments of theoretical investigations and expansion of application fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Control and Cybernetics
Control and Cybernetics 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The field of interest covers general concepts, theories, methods and techniques associated with analysis, modelling, control and management in various systems (e.g. technological, economic, ecological, social). The journal is particularly interested in results in the following areas of research: Systems and control theory: general systems theory, optimal cotrol, optimization theory, data analysis, learning, artificial intelligence, modelling & identification, game theory, multicriteria optimisation, decision and negotiation methods, soft approaches: stochastic and fuzzy methods, computer science,
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信