欧洲共同参考框架:超越视角

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
A. Strugielska, K. Piątkowska, Ewa Kościałkowska-Okońska
{"title":"欧洲共同参考框架:超越视角","authors":"A. Strugielska, K. Piątkowska, Ewa Kościałkowska-Okońska","doi":"10.58221/mosp.v116i1.6733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stressing a balanced and constrained interplay between the individual and the collective and tending towards transdisciplinarity as a consequence, a socio-cognitive perspective prevails in second language acquisition research (Larsen-Freeman 2018). Advancing several theories, including the task-based approach, the ecological approach as well as sociocultural and socio-constructivist theories, the latest version of the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020) has adopted a transdisciplinary perspective. However, the nature of the transdisciplinary approach declared by the Framework (Council of Europe 2020) remains an empirical question. Thus, the present paper explores the extent to which the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020) abides by the principles of a motivated socio-cognitive perspective. The structure of the paper is the following. First, it outlines a transdisciplinary approach to second language development basing on cognitive linguistics, intercultural pragmatics and elements of the teaching learning process. Then, this socio-cognitive approach is sought in the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020). The analysis of the document demonstrates that the social and the individual perspective are symmetrical but not fully integrated, i.e. there is no common denominator linking the two approaches.","PeriodicalId":41279,"journal":{"name":"MODERNA SPRAK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Common European Framework of Reference: Transcending perspectives\",\"authors\":\"A. Strugielska, K. Piątkowska, Ewa Kościałkowska-Okońska\",\"doi\":\"10.58221/mosp.v116i1.6733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stressing a balanced and constrained interplay between the individual and the collective and tending towards transdisciplinarity as a consequence, a socio-cognitive perspective prevails in second language acquisition research (Larsen-Freeman 2018). Advancing several theories, including the task-based approach, the ecological approach as well as sociocultural and socio-constructivist theories, the latest version of the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020) has adopted a transdisciplinary perspective. However, the nature of the transdisciplinary approach declared by the Framework (Council of Europe 2020) remains an empirical question. Thus, the present paper explores the extent to which the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020) abides by the principles of a motivated socio-cognitive perspective. The structure of the paper is the following. First, it outlines a transdisciplinary approach to second language development basing on cognitive linguistics, intercultural pragmatics and elements of the teaching learning process. Then, this socio-cognitive approach is sought in the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020). The analysis of the document demonstrates that the social and the individual perspective are symmetrical but not fully integrated, i.e. there is no common denominator linking the two approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODERNA SPRAK\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODERNA SPRAK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v116i1.6733\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERNA SPRAK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58221/mosp.v116i1.6733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强调个人和集体之间平衡和受限的相互作用,并因此倾向于跨学科,社会认知视角在第二语言习得研究中占主导地位(Larsen Freeman,2018)。欧洲委员会2020的最新版本提出了一些理论,包括基于任务的方法、生态方法以及社会文化和社会建构主义理论,采用了跨学科的视角。然而,该框架(欧洲委员会2020)宣布的跨学科方法的性质仍然是一个经验问题。因此,本文探讨了CEFR(欧洲委员会2020)在多大程度上遵守动机社会认知视角的原则。本文的结构如下。首先,基于认知语言学、跨文化语用学和教学过程的要素,概述了第二语言发展的跨学科方法。然后,欧洲委员会(CEFR)寻求这种社会认知方法。对该文件的分析表明,社会观点和个人观点是对称的,但并没有完全融合,即这两种方法之间没有共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Common European Framework of Reference: Transcending perspectives
Stressing a balanced and constrained interplay between the individual and the collective and tending towards transdisciplinarity as a consequence, a socio-cognitive perspective prevails in second language acquisition research (Larsen-Freeman 2018). Advancing several theories, including the task-based approach, the ecological approach as well as sociocultural and socio-constructivist theories, the latest version of the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020) has adopted a transdisciplinary perspective. However, the nature of the transdisciplinary approach declared by the Framework (Council of Europe 2020) remains an empirical question. Thus, the present paper explores the extent to which the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020) abides by the principles of a motivated socio-cognitive perspective. The structure of the paper is the following. First, it outlines a transdisciplinary approach to second language development basing on cognitive linguistics, intercultural pragmatics and elements of the teaching learning process. Then, this socio-cognitive approach is sought in the CEFR (Council of Europe 2020). The analysis of the document demonstrates that the social and the individual perspective are symmetrical but not fully integrated, i.e. there is no common denominator linking the two approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MODERNA SPRAK
MODERNA SPRAK Multiple-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: It is a pleasure to be able to welcome you to web-based Moderna språk, the journal of English, French, German and Spanish languages, literatures and cultures! Moderna språk has been published every year since 1906, and it is thus one of the oldest journals of its kind in the world. Until 2008, Moderna språk came out in a printed version, but from 2009 it is published as a web-based journal on the Internet. Our aim is to publish all articles from 1906 and onwards electronically, by gradual stages. The articles in Moderna språk cover areas within linguistics, literature and culture and the main target group is language teachers and researchers at schools and universities worldwide. The publication is peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信