“第四帝国在这里”

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Julian Pänke
{"title":"“第四帝国在这里”","authors":"Julian Pänke","doi":"10.3167/GPS.2020.380304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores German leadership in Europe as mirrored in national-populist media discourses in Britain, Greece, and Poland. In an effort to discredit the EU as another attempt at German imperialism, accusations of EU institutions being modeled after German blueprints constrain Berlin’s ability to achieve effective and legitimate European leadership. By applying role theory, the argument investigates why these ideas and images resonate so well. The article presents three supportive contexts of a German leadership paradox that—together with painful World War II memories—lead to the persistence of certain national-populist discourses. These include (1) Germany’s Nazi past; (2) German nation-building, which partly resembles European integration processes; and (3) like the eu, Germany’s projection of its interests in terms of normative power (or Zivilmacht), thereby constructing and recognizing respective selfs in “civilizing missions.” This article does not aim to strengthen such populist readings but instead advocates addressing them more openly.","PeriodicalId":44521,"journal":{"name":"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY","volume":"38 1","pages":"54-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Fourth Reich Is Here”\",\"authors\":\"Julian Pänke\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/GPS.2020.380304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article explores German leadership in Europe as mirrored in national-populist media discourses in Britain, Greece, and Poland. In an effort to discredit the EU as another attempt at German imperialism, accusations of EU institutions being modeled after German blueprints constrain Berlin’s ability to achieve effective and legitimate European leadership. By applying role theory, the argument investigates why these ideas and images resonate so well. The article presents three supportive contexts of a German leadership paradox that—together with painful World War II memories—lead to the persistence of certain national-populist discourses. These include (1) Germany’s Nazi past; (2) German nation-building, which partly resembles European integration processes; and (3) like the eu, Germany’s projection of its interests in terms of normative power (or Zivilmacht), thereby constructing and recognizing respective selfs in “civilizing missions.” This article does not aim to strengthen such populist readings but instead advocates addressing them more openly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"54-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/GPS.2020.380304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/GPS.2020.380304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了德国在欧洲的领导地位,反映在英国、希腊和波兰的民族民粹主义媒体话语中。为了抹黑欧盟是德国帝国主义的又一次尝试,对欧盟机构模仿德国蓝图的指责,限制了柏林实现有效和合法的欧洲领导力的能力。通过运用角色理论,本文探讨了为什么这些观点和形象会引起如此强烈的共鸣。这篇文章提出了德国领导层悖论的三个支持背景,这些悖论与痛苦的二战记忆一起导致了某些民族民粹主义话语的持续存在。其中包括:(1)德国的纳粹历史;(2)德国的国家建设,部分类似于欧洲一体化进程;(3)像欧盟一样,德国在规范权力(或民事权力)方面的利益投射,从而在“文明使命”中构建和承认各自的自我。本文的目的不是加强这种民粹主义解读,而是提倡更公开地讨论这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“The Fourth Reich Is Here”
The article explores German leadership in Europe as mirrored in national-populist media discourses in Britain, Greece, and Poland. In an effort to discredit the EU as another attempt at German imperialism, accusations of EU institutions being modeled after German blueprints constrain Berlin’s ability to achieve effective and legitimate European leadership. By applying role theory, the argument investigates why these ideas and images resonate so well. The article presents three supportive contexts of a German leadership paradox that—together with painful World War II memories—lead to the persistence of certain national-populist discourses. These include (1) Germany’s Nazi past; (2) German nation-building, which partly resembles European integration processes; and (3) like the eu, Germany’s projection of its interests in terms of normative power (or Zivilmacht), thereby constructing and recognizing respective selfs in “civilizing missions.” This article does not aim to strengthen such populist readings but instead advocates addressing them more openly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信