衡量反垄断诉讼中的基准损害赔偿：延伸及其现实意义

Q3 Mathematics

Journal of Econometric Methods Pub Date : 2019-09-07 DOI:10.1515/jem-2019-0010

Ai Deng

{"title":"衡量反垄断诉讼中的基准损害赔偿：延伸及其现实意义","authors":"Ai Deng","doi":"10.1515/jem-2019-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper compares the “forecasting approach” and the “fully interacted approach” to estimation of cartel damages. We investigate the impact of relaxing the assumptions of exogeneity and stationarity, both theoretically and in Monte Carlo simulations. The results suggest that the advantages of the fully interacted approach are less clear and that the forecasting approach may be more robust to the relaxations of some of these maintained assumptions.","PeriodicalId":36727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Econometric Methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jem-2019-0010","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Benchmark Damages in Antitrust Litigation: Extensions and Practical Implications\",\"authors\":\"Ai Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jem-2019-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper compares the “forecasting approach” and the “fully interacted approach” to estimation of cartel damages. We investigate the impact of relaxing the assumptions of exogeneity and stationarity, both theoretically and in Monte Carlo simulations. The results suggest that the advantages of the fully interacted approach are less clear and that the forecasting approach may be more robust to the relaxations of some of these maintained assumptions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Econometric Methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jem-2019-0010\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Econometric Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jem-2019-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Econometric Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jem-2019-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文比较了卡特尔损害估计的“预测法”和“全交互法”。我们从理论上和蒙特卡洛模拟中研究了放松外遗传性和平稳性假设的影响。结果表明，完全相互作用方法的优势不太明显，预测方法可能对其中一些保持的假设的放松更为稳健。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Measuring Benchmark Damages in Antitrust Litigation: Extensions and Practical Implications

Abstract This paper compares the “forecasting approach” and the “fully interacted approach” to estimation of cartel damages. We investigate the impact of relaxing the assumptions of exogeneity and stationarity, both theoretically and in Monte Carlo simulations. The results suggest that the advantages of the fully interacted approach are less clear and that the forecasting approach may be more robust to the relaxations of some of these maintained assumptions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Econometric Methods Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量