复合名词并不总是满足连词命题:运用心智模型理论的分析

Miguel López‐Astorga
{"title":"复合名词并不总是满足连词命题:运用心智模型理论的分析","authors":"Miguel López‐Astorga","doi":"10.25100/lenguaje.v49i2.9365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is intended to show that the properties classical logic attributes to conjunction are not always found in real compound nouns in natural language. This fact is described by means of several examples taken from different natural languages. The main conclusion is that perhaps a better option to understand human language and communicative phenomena is to assume a basically semantic approach with the mental model theory proposed as a more suitable alternative. This is because the fact that the logical properties that are not always present in real compound nouns is not considered a problem under the framework of this theory.","PeriodicalId":32749,"journal":{"name":"Lenguaje","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compound nouns do not always fulfill the conjunction thesis: An analysis using the mental model theory\",\"authors\":\"Miguel López‐Astorga\",\"doi\":\"10.25100/lenguaje.v49i2.9365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is intended to show that the properties classical logic attributes to conjunction are not always found in real compound nouns in natural language. This fact is described by means of several examples taken from different natural languages. The main conclusion is that perhaps a better option to understand human language and communicative phenomena is to assume a basically semantic approach with the mental model theory proposed as a more suitable alternative. This is because the fact that the logical properties that are not always present in real compound nouns is not considered a problem under the framework of this theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lenguaje\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lenguaje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v49i2.9365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lenguaje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v49i2.9365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在证明自然语言中的实复合名词并不总是具有连接的经典逻辑属性。这一事实是通过从不同的自然语言中提取的几个例子来描述的。主要结论是,也许理解人类语言和交际现象的更好选择是假设一种基本的语义方法,心理模型理论是一种更合适的选择。这是因为在这个理论的框架下,真实的复合名词中并不总是存在的逻辑性质并不被认为是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compound nouns do not always fulfill the conjunction thesis: An analysis using the mental model theory
This paper is intended to show that the properties classical logic attributes to conjunction are not always found in real compound nouns in natural language. This fact is described by means of several examples taken from different natural languages. The main conclusion is that perhaps a better option to understand human language and communicative phenomena is to assume a basically semantic approach with the mental model theory proposed as a more suitable alternative. This is because the fact that the logical properties that are not always present in real compound nouns is not considered a problem under the framework of this theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信