介绍

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Herman, Michael C. Kane
{"title":"介绍","authors":"J. Herman, Michael C. Kane","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2019.1702466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The introduction to the Special Issue on Validity Studies lays out the rationale and provides an overview of the four articles comprising the issue. Each of the articles focuses on the validation of a specific instrument for a given purpose. The set represents a range of assessment types and uses, including the assessment of reading strategy use, an observation measure of special education teachers, a next generation alternative assessment for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, and a student self report survey to assess and respond to individual risks and needs that may lead to truancy and/or school failure, Each article presents a unique case of using evidence to support the argument that scores from a given instrument provide both intended inferences and valid information for a given purpose. The concluding commentary summarizes lessons learned and challenges remaining for the field.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"25 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702466","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction\",\"authors\":\"J. Herman, Michael C. Kane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10627197.2019.1702466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The introduction to the Special Issue on Validity Studies lays out the rationale and provides an overview of the four articles comprising the issue. Each of the articles focuses on the validation of a specific instrument for a given purpose. The set represents a range of assessment types and uses, including the assessment of reading strategy use, an observation measure of special education teachers, a next generation alternative assessment for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, and a student self report survey to assess and respond to individual risks and needs that may lead to truancy and/or school failure, Each article presents a unique case of using evidence to support the argument that scores from a given instrument provide both intended inferences and valid information for a given purpose. The concluding commentary summarizes lessons learned and challenges remaining for the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702466\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2019.1702466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对有效性研究特刊的介绍列出了基本原理,并提供了组成该问题的四篇文章的概述。每篇文章都侧重于针对特定目的对特定工具进行验证。这套测试代表了一系列的评估类型和用途,包括对阅读策略使用的评估,对特殊教育教师的观察测量,对具有最严重认知障碍的学生的下一代替代评估,以及一项学生自我报告调查,以评估和应对可能导致逃学和/或学业失败的个人风险和需求。每篇文章都提出了一个独特的案例,用证据来支持这样的论点:给定工具的分数既提供了预期的推断,也为给定的目的提供了有效的信息。结束语总结了该领域的经验教训和仍然存在的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction
ABSTRACT The introduction to the Special Issue on Validity Studies lays out the rationale and provides an overview of the four articles comprising the issue. Each of the articles focuses on the validation of a specific instrument for a given purpose. The set represents a range of assessment types and uses, including the assessment of reading strategy use, an observation measure of special education teachers, a next generation alternative assessment for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, and a student self report survey to assess and respond to individual risks and needs that may lead to truancy and/or school failure, Each article presents a unique case of using evidence to support the argument that scores from a given instrument provide both intended inferences and valid information for a given purpose. The concluding commentary summarizes lessons learned and challenges remaining for the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信