道义法医检验结论在立陶宛刑事诉讼中的意义

Teise Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.15388/teise.2021.120.7
Laura Šivickaitė-Moldarienė
{"title":"道义法医检验结论在立陶宛刑事诉讼中的意义","authors":"Laura Šivickaitė-Moldarienė","doi":"10.15388/teise.2021.120.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Definition and regulation of forensic deontological examination are presented in the article. The presumption that the expert becomes scientific judge in cases related to mistakes of physicians is defended basing it on forensic and court practices.","PeriodicalId":33051,"journal":{"name":"Teise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of Conclusions of Deontological Forensic Examination in Lithuanian Criminal Procedure\",\"authors\":\"Laura Šivickaitė-Moldarienė\",\"doi\":\"10.15388/teise.2021.120.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Definition and regulation of forensic deontological examination are presented in the article. The presumption that the expert becomes scientific judge in cases related to mistakes of physicians is defended basing it on forensic and court practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2021.120.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/teise.2021.120.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了法医义务生物学检验的定义和规范。在与医生错误有关的案件中,专家成为科学法官的假设是基于法医学和法庭实践进行辩护的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Significance of Conclusions of Deontological Forensic Examination in Lithuanian Criminal Procedure
Definition and regulation of forensic deontological examination are presented in the article. The presumption that the expert becomes scientific judge in cases related to mistakes of physicians is defended basing it on forensic and court practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信