通过比较解决策略和课堂讨论培养灵活性:两个专业发展计划的效果

IF 3.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christian Rüede, S. Mok, Fritz C. Staub
{"title":"通过比较解决策略和课堂讨论培养灵活性:两个专业发展计划的效果","authors":"Christian Rüede, S. Mok, Fritz C. Staub","doi":"10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shows that enabling teachers to integrate comparing solution strategies into their teaching fosters student flexibility in algebra. We designed two professional development (PD) programs that either focused exclusively on comparing solution strategies, or additionally introduced the accountable talk approach to guiding productive classroom discussions. The effects of both PD programs were investigated in an experimental field study (N = 39 teachers, 739 students). In both experimental groups, student posttest gains in strategy flexibility and procedural knowledge were greater than in the control group. The accountable talk group also increased conceptual knowledge. Significant effects in strategy flexibility were still observed 2.5 months later. We discuss recommendations for PD programs to foster flexibility in algebra using comparing.","PeriodicalId":48084,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering Flexibility Using Comparing Solution Strategies and Classroom Discussion: Effects of Two Professional Development Programs\",\"authors\":\"Christian Rüede, S. Mok, Fritz C. Staub\",\"doi\":\"10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article shows that enabling teachers to integrate comparing solution strategies into their teaching fosters student flexibility in algebra. We designed two professional development (PD) programs that either focused exclusively on comparing solution strategies, or additionally introduced the accountable talk approach to guiding productive classroom discussions. The effects of both PD programs were investigated in an experimental field study (N = 39 teachers, 739 students). In both experimental groups, student posttest gains in strategy flexibility and procedural knowledge were greater than in the control group. The accountable talk group also increased conceptual knowledge. Significant effects in strategy flexibility were still observed 2.5 months later. We discuss recommendations for PD programs to foster flexibility in algebra using comparing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0232\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Research in Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇文章表明,使教师能够将比较解决策略融入教学中,可以培养学生在代数方面的灵活性。我们设计了两个专业发展(PD)项目,要么专门侧重于比较解决方案策略,要么额外引入了负责任的谈话方法来指导富有成效的课堂讨论。在一项实验性实地研究中调查了两个PD项目的效果(N=39名教师,739名学生)。在两个实验组中,学生在策略灵活性和程序知识方面的后测成绩都高于对照组。问责谈话小组还增加了概念知识。策略灵活性仍有显著影响2.5 几个月后。我们讨论了PD程序的建议,以通过比较来培养代数的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fostering Flexibility Using Comparing Solution Strategies and Classroom Discussion: Effects of Two Professional Development Programs
This article shows that enabling teachers to integrate comparing solution strategies into their teaching fosters student flexibility in algebra. We designed two professional development (PD) programs that either focused exclusively on comparing solution strategies, or additionally introduced the accountable talk approach to guiding productive classroom discussions. The effects of both PD programs were investigated in an experimental field study (N = 39 teachers, 739 students). In both experimental groups, student posttest gains in strategy flexibility and procedural knowledge were greater than in the control group. The accountable talk group also increased conceptual knowledge. Significant effects in strategy flexibility were still observed 2.5 months later. We discuss recommendations for PD programs to foster flexibility in algebra using comparing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: An official journal of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), JRME is the premier research journal in mathematics education and is devoted to the interests of teachers and researchers at all levels--preschool through college. JRME is a forum for disciplined inquiry into the teaching and learning of mathematics. The editors encourage submissions including: -Research reports, addressing important research questions and issues in mathematics education, -Brief reports of research, -Research commentaries on issues pertaining to mathematics education research, and -Book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信