第二次机会教育计划作为失业激活措施的有效性:来自爱尔兰的证据

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal of Education and Work Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1080/13639080.2022.2059453

E. Kelly, S. McGuinness, A. Bergin, Adele Whelan

{"title":"第二次机会教育计划作为失业激活措施的有效性:来自爱尔兰的证据","authors":"E. Kelly, S. McGuinness, A. Bergin, Adele Whelan","doi":"10.1080/13639080.2022.2059453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Using a matching framework and high-quality administrative longitudinal and survey data, we evaluate the effectiveness of a second-chance education opportunity scheme, the Back to Education Allowance (BTEA), in assisting jobseekers to find employment on completion of their course. The results from two separate datasets indicate that BTEA scheme participation had large negative consequences for subsequent employment transitions. Further analysis revealed the negative impacts are likely to be related to flaws in the BTEA scheme framework rather than deficits in the quality of the education received. These results hold when tested against the influences of sample selection and unobserved heterogeneity bias.","PeriodicalId":47445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of a second-chance education scheme as an unemployment activation measure: evidence from Ireland\",\"authors\":\"E. Kelly, S. McGuinness, A. Bergin, Adele Whelan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13639080.2022.2059453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Using a matching framework and high-quality administrative longitudinal and survey data, we evaluate the effectiveness of a second-chance education opportunity scheme, the Back to Education Allowance (BTEA), in assisting jobseekers to find employment on completion of their course. The results from two separate datasets indicate that BTEA scheme participation had large negative consequences for subsequent employment transitions. Further analysis revealed the negative impacts are likely to be related to flaws in the BTEA scheme framework rather than deficits in the quality of the education received. These results hold when tested against the influences of sample selection and unobserved heterogeneity bias.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education and Work\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education and Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2022.2059453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2022.2059453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要利用匹配框架和高质量的行政纵向和调查数据，我们评估了第二次机会教育机会计划——重返教育津贴（BTEA）在帮助求职者完成课程后找到工作方面的有效性。来自两个独立数据集的结果表明，BTEA计划的参与对随后的就业转变产生了巨大的负面影响。进一步的分析表明，负面影响可能与BTEA计划框架的缺陷有关，而不是与所接受教育质量的缺陷有关。当对照样本选择和未观察到的异质性偏差的影响进行测试时，这些结果成立。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The effectiveness of a second-chance education scheme as an unemployment activation measure: evidence from Ireland

ABSTRACT Using a matching framework and high-quality administrative longitudinal and survey data, we evaluate the effectiveness of a second-chance education opportunity scheme, the Back to Education Allowance (BTEA), in assisting jobseekers to find employment on completion of their course. The results from two separate datasets indicate that BTEA scheme participation had large negative consequences for subsequent employment transitions. Further analysis revealed the negative impacts are likely to be related to flaws in the BTEA scheme framework rather than deficits in the quality of the education received. These results hold when tested against the influences of sample selection and unobserved heterogeneity bias.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Education and Work EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Education and Work is an international forum for academic research and policy analysis which focuses on the interplay of the education and economic systems. The journal examines how knowledge, skills, values and attitudes both about and for work and employment are developed within the education system. The journal also explores the various forms of industrial training and accreditation in the economic system, including changes in the economic and industrial infrastructure which influence the type of employees required. Work in the informal economy is also included.