探讨DSM-5中人格障碍备选模型中标准A和标准B的重叠和预测效度

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

International Journal of Testing Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661

Carla Martí Valls, Kitty Balazadeh, P. Kajonius

{"title":"探讨DSM-5中人格障碍备选模型中标准A和标准B的重叠和预测效度","authors":"Carla Martí Valls, Kitty Balazadeh, P. Kajonius","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) consists of level of personality functioning (Criterion A) and maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B). The brief scale versions of these are understudied, while often being used by clinicians and researchers. In this study, we wanted to investigate the overlap and predictive validity of Criterion A and B. Participants (N = 253) were measured on level of personality functioning (LPFS-BF) and maladaptive personality traits (PID-5-BF), as well as internalizing outcomes such existential meaninglessness (EMS) and externalizing outcomes such as substance and behavioral addictions (SSAB). Data analysis was conducted with principal component analysis (PCA) and regression analyses. The results showed over 50% overlap between the brief versions of Criterion A and B, while Criterion B slightly outperformed Criterion A in outcomes of EMS and SSAB. We discuss the potential redundancy and usefulness of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits.","PeriodicalId":46615,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Testing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the overlap and predictive validity between Criterion A and B in the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5\",\"authors\":\"Carla Martí Valls, Kitty Balazadeh, P. Kajonius\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) consists of level of personality functioning (Criterion A) and maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B). The brief scale versions of these are understudied, while often being used by clinicians and researchers. In this study, we wanted to investigate the overlap and predictive validity of Criterion A and B. Participants (N = 253) were measured on level of personality functioning (LPFS-BF) and maladaptive personality traits (PID-5-BF), as well as internalizing outcomes such existential meaninglessness (EMS) and externalizing outcomes such as substance and behavioral addictions (SSAB). Data analysis was conducted with principal component analysis (PCA) and regression analyses. The results showed over 50% overlap between the brief versions of Criterion A and B, while Criterion B slightly outperformed Criterion A in outcomes of EMS and SSAB. We discuss the potential redundancy and usefulness of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Testing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Testing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要人格障碍的DSM-5替代模型（AMPD）由人格功能水平（标准A）和适应不良人格特征（标准B）组成。这些简短的量表版本研究不足，而临床医生和研究人员经常使用。在这项研究中，我们想调查标准A和B的重叠和预测有效性。参与者（N = 253）的人格功能水平（LPFS-BF）和适应不良人格特征（PID-5-BF），以及内化结果（如存在无意义（EMS））和外化结果（如物质和行为成瘾（SSAB））。数据分析采用主成分分析（PCA）和回归分析。结果显示，标准A和标准B的简短版本之间有超过50%的重叠，而标准B在EMS和SSAB的结果上略优于标准A。我们讨论了人格功能和不适应人格特征的潜在冗余和有用性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Investigating the overlap and predictive validity between Criterion A and B in the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5

Abstract The Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) consists of level of personality functioning (Criterion A) and maladaptive personality traits (Criterion B). The brief scale versions of these are understudied, while often being used by clinicians and researchers. In this study, we wanted to investigate the overlap and predictive validity of Criterion A and B. Participants (N = 253) were measured on level of personality functioning (LPFS-BF) and maladaptive personality traits (PID-5-BF), as well as internalizing outcomes such existential meaninglessness (EMS) and externalizing outcomes such as substance and behavioral addictions (SSAB). Data analysis was conducted with principal component analysis (PCA) and regression analyses. The results showed over 50% overlap between the brief versions of Criterion A and B, while Criterion B slightly outperformed Criterion A in outcomes of EMS and SSAB. We discuss the potential redundancy and usefulness of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Testing SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

11.80%

发文量