合同自由的限制

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW
M. Bridge
{"title":"合同自由的限制","authors":"M. Bridge","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxz017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article is concerned with an important feature of English law that distinguishes it sharply from civilian systems of law and, to a lesser extent, from other common law systems—namely, its eschewal of an imposed duty of good faith and fair dealing. It will be shown that English law is receptive to such a standard in particular cases but that much of the ground that may be thought to be covered by good faith and fair dealing is covered instead by controls on the exercise of contractual discretion by reference to an implied contractual term that the discretion not be exercised in a way that is capricious, arbitrary, or irrational. This body of law has grown up in the last 30 years or so and has been influenced to a degree by public law considerations.","PeriodicalId":42366,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cjcl/cxz017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limits on Contractual Freedom\",\"authors\":\"M. Bridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cjcl/cxz017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article is concerned with an important feature of English law that distinguishes it sharply from civilian systems of law and, to a lesser extent, from other common law systems—namely, its eschewal of an imposed duty of good faith and fair dealing. It will be shown that English law is receptive to such a standard in particular cases but that much of the ground that may be thought to be covered by good faith and fair dealing is covered instead by controls on the exercise of contractual discretion by reference to an implied contractual term that the discretion not be exercised in a way that is capricious, arbitrary, or irrational. This body of law has grown up in the last 30 years or so and has been influenced to a degree by public law considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/cjcl/cxz017\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxz017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxz017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章关注的是英国法律的一个重要特征,它与民事法律体系有着明显的区别,并且在较小程度上与其他普通法体系区别开来,即它回避了强加的诚信和公平交易义务。我们将会看到,英国法律在特殊情况下接受这样的标准,但是很多可能被认为是由诚信和公平交易所涵盖的基础是由对合同自由裁量权行使的控制所涵盖的,通过参考一个隐含的合同条款,自由裁量权不能以一种反复无常、武断或非理性的方式行使。这一法律体系在过去30年左右的时间里发展起来,并在一定程度上受到公法考虑的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Limits on Contractual Freedom
This article is concerned with an important feature of English law that distinguishes it sharply from civilian systems of law and, to a lesser extent, from other common law systems—namely, its eschewal of an imposed duty of good faith and fair dealing. It will be shown that English law is receptive to such a standard in particular cases but that much of the ground that may be thought to be covered by good faith and fair dealing is covered instead by controls on the exercise of contractual discretion by reference to an implied contractual term that the discretion not be exercised in a way that is capricious, arbitrary, or irrational. This body of law has grown up in the last 30 years or so and has been influenced to a degree by public law considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law (CJCL) is an independent, peer-reviewed, general comparative law journal published under the auspices of the International Academy of Comparative Law (IACL) and in association with the Silk Road Institute for International and Comparative Law (SRIICL) at Xi’an Jiaotong University, PR China. CJCL aims to provide a leading international forum for comparative studies on all disciplines of law, including cross-disciplinary legal studies. It gives preference to articles addressing issues of fundamental and lasting importance in the field of comparative law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信