英国公共服务紧缩政策的后果

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Hernandez Tania Arrieta
{"title":"英国公共服务紧缩政策的后果","authors":"Hernandez Tania Arrieta","doi":"10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the changing landscape of public service provision in the UK during austerity. Austerity is presented through the notions of retrenchment, decentralisation and shifts in governance. The analysis shows that retrenchment and decentralisation eroded the capacity of public institutions to protect the provision of vital public services. This is revealed through the reduced provision of non-statutory services and the reinforcement of inequalities in service provision. Shifts in governance have led to mixed outcomes in the quality of services. This article also addresses how austerity influenced many of the problems observed in service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vital public services in the UK faced the pandemic with a diminished resource base, heightened inequalities and significant fragmentation in service provision.","PeriodicalId":44923,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Social Justice","volume":"15 1","pages":"518-537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Consequences of the Austerity Policies for Public Services in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Hernandez Tania Arrieta\",\"doi\":\"10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the changing landscape of public service provision in the UK during austerity. Austerity is presented through the notions of retrenchment, decentralisation and shifts in governance. The analysis shows that retrenchment and decentralisation eroded the capacity of public institutions to protect the provision of vital public services. This is revealed through the reduced provision of non-statutory services and the reinforcement of inequalities in service provision. Shifts in governance have led to mixed outcomes in the quality of services. This article also addresses how austerity influenced many of the problems observed in service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vital public services in the UK faced the pandemic with a diminished resource base, heightened inequalities and significant fragmentation in service provision.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Social Justice\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"518-537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2568\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26522/SSJ.V15I3.2568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文考察了紧缩时期英国公共服务提供的变化格局。紧缩是通过紧缩、权力下放和治理转变的概念来体现的。分析表明,紧缩和权力下放削弱了公共机构保护提供重要公共服务的能力。非法定服务的提供减少和服务提供中不平等现象的加剧体现了这一点。治理的转变导致服务质量参差不齐。这篇文章还阐述了在新冠肺炎大流行期间,紧缩如何影响服务提供中观察到的许多问题。英国的重要公共服务面临疫情,资源基础减少,不平等加剧,服务提供严重分散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Consequences of the Austerity Policies for Public Services in the UK
This article examines the changing landscape of public service provision in the UK during austerity. Austerity is presented through the notions of retrenchment, decentralisation and shifts in governance. The analysis shows that retrenchment and decentralisation eroded the capacity of public institutions to protect the provision of vital public services. This is revealed through the reduced provision of non-statutory services and the reinforcement of inequalities in service provision. Shifts in governance have led to mixed outcomes in the quality of services. This article also addresses how austerity influenced many of the problems observed in service provision during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vital public services in the UK faced the pandemic with a diminished resource base, heightened inequalities and significant fragmentation in service provision.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Social Justice
Studies in Social Justice POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信