{"title":"复发性流产的当前管理","authors":"Mark R Chester, A. Tirlapur, K. Jayaprakasan","doi":"10.1111/tog.12832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Referral criteria to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) services vary, owing in part to a lack of consensus on the definition of RPL. Good quality evidence is limited, and controversies exist on recommendations for investigations and management of RPL. People with RPL will most likely achieve a live birth in their next pregnancy but should have an individualised approach that identifies and corrects any modifiable risk factors and offers appropriate psychological support.","PeriodicalId":51862,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current management of recurrent pregnancy loss\",\"authors\":\"Mark R Chester, A. Tirlapur, K. Jayaprakasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tog.12832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Referral criteria to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) services vary, owing in part to a lack of consensus on the definition of RPL. Good quality evidence is limited, and controversies exist on recommendations for investigations and management of RPL. People with RPL will most likely achieve a live birth in their next pregnancy but should have an individualised approach that identifies and corrects any modifiable risk factors and offers appropriate psychological support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Referral criteria to recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) services vary, owing in part to a lack of consensus on the definition of RPL. Good quality evidence is limited, and controversies exist on recommendations for investigations and management of RPL. People with RPL will most likely achieve a live birth in their next pregnancy but should have an individualised approach that identifies and corrects any modifiable risk factors and offers appropriate psychological support.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
