庇护的技术障碍:寻求庇护者作为被迫的技术使用者和通过迷失方向进行管理

IF 2.8 1区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Security Dialogue Pub Date : 2021-08-26 DOI:10.1177/09670106211026080

M. Tazzioli

{"title":"庇护的技术障碍:寻求庇护者作为被迫的技术使用者和通过迷失方向进行管理","authors":"M. Tazzioli","doi":"10.1177/09670106211026080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the technologies and apps that asylum seekers need to navigate as forced hindered techno-users in order to get access to asylum and financial support. With a focus on the Greek refugee system, it discusses the multiple technological intermediations that asylum seekers face when dealing with the cash assistance programme and how asylum seekers are obstructed in accessing asylum and financial support. It explores the widespread disorientation that asylum seekers experience as they navigate un-legible techno-scripts that change over time. The article critically engages with the literature on the securitization and victimization of refugees, and it argues that asylum seekers are not treated exclusively as potential threats or as victims, but also as forced hindered subjects; that is, they are kept in a condition of protracted uncertainty during which they must find out the multiple technological and bureaucratic steps they are requested to comply with. In the final section, the article illustrates how forced technological mediations actually reinforce asylum seekers’ dependence on humanitarian actors and enhance socio-legal precarity.","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":"53 1","pages":"202 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The technological obstructions of asylum: Asylum seekers as forced techno-users and governing through disorientation\",\"authors\":\"M. Tazzioli\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09670106211026080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the technologies and apps that asylum seekers need to navigate as forced hindered techno-users in order to get access to asylum and financial support. With a focus on the Greek refugee system, it discusses the multiple technological intermediations that asylum seekers face when dealing with the cash assistance programme and how asylum seekers are obstructed in accessing asylum and financial support. It explores the widespread disorientation that asylum seekers experience as they navigate un-legible techno-scripts that change over time. The article critically engages with the literature on the securitization and victimization of refugees, and it argues that asylum seekers are not treated exclusively as potential threats or as victims, but also as forced hindered subjects; that is, they are kept in a condition of protracted uncertainty during which they must find out the multiple technological and bureaucratic steps they are requested to comply with. In the final section, the article illustrates how forced technological mediations actually reinforce asylum seekers’ dependence on humanitarian actors and enhance socio-legal precarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Security Dialogue\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"202 - 219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Security Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106211026080\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106211026080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

本文讨论了寻求庇护者需要使用的技术和应用程序，这些技术和应用程序是被强制阻碍的技术用户，以便获得庇护和经济支持。它以希腊难民制度为重点，讨论了寻求庇护者在处理现金援助方案时面临的多种技术中介，以及寻求庇护者如何在获得庇护和财政支持方面受到阻碍。它探讨了寻求庇护者在浏览随着时间而变化的难以辨认的技术脚本时所经历的普遍的迷失方向。这篇文章批判性地与有关难民证券化和受害的文献进行了接触，并认为寻求庇护者不仅被视为潜在的威胁或受害者，而且还被视为被迫受阻的主体;也就是说，他们处于一种长期不确定的状态，在此期间，他们必须找出他们被要求遵守的多种技术和官僚步骤。在文章的最后一部分，文章说明了强制技术调解如何实际上加强了寻求庇护者对人道主义行为者的依赖，并加剧了社会法律的不稳定性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The technological obstructions of asylum: Asylum seekers as forced techno-users and governing through disorientation

This article deals with the technologies and apps that asylum seekers need to navigate as forced hindered techno-users in order to get access to asylum and financial support. With a focus on the Greek refugee system, it discusses the multiple technological intermediations that asylum seekers face when dealing with the cash assistance programme and how asylum seekers are obstructed in accessing asylum and financial support. It explores the widespread disorientation that asylum seekers experience as they navigate un-legible techno-scripts that change over time. The article critically engages with the literature on the securitization and victimization of refugees, and it argues that asylum seekers are not treated exclusively as potential threats or as victims, but also as forced hindered subjects; that is, they are kept in a condition of protracted uncertainty during which they must find out the multiple technological and bureaucratic steps they are requested to comply with. In the final section, the article illustrates how forced technological mediations actually reinforce asylum seekers’ dependence on humanitarian actors and enhance socio-legal precarity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.