{"title":"不同方法的比较,以便进行具有代表性的小豆蔻核心采集","authors":"V. Cravero, I. Crippa, E. Martin, E. Cointry","doi":"10.31047/1668.298X.V36.N1.21904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"his study was carried out in order to compare different methodologies to select a representative core collection from an initial collection of Cynara cardunculus L. species, using both morphological and molecular markers. The combination of two stratification criteria with three sampling strategies allowed the establishment of six different core collections. The Maximization strategy was applied in order to obtain the seventh one. All the obtained collections were validated through phenotypic and molecular parameters, establishing as an initial criterion that the core collection should include, at most, 35-40 % of the accessions belonging to the original collection. All collections passed molecular validation; nevertheless morphological validation determined that the Proportional sampling strategy is the best to keep the initial variability while retaining the least number of accessions, especially when combined with the first stratification criterion. Although Maximization strategy allowed to preserve the original variability, it retained the largest number of accessions. In conclusion, the combination PrS1 (proportional sampling and first stratification criterion) is the best strategy to perform a representative core collection from a Cynara cardunculus L. initial collection, using both morphological and molecular data.","PeriodicalId":39278,"journal":{"name":"AgriScientia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31047/1668.298X.V36.N1.21904","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different methodologies in order to perform a representative Cynara cardunculus L. core collection\",\"authors\":\"V. Cravero, I. Crippa, E. Martin, E. Cointry\",\"doi\":\"10.31047/1668.298X.V36.N1.21904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"his study was carried out in order to compare different methodologies to select a representative core collection from an initial collection of Cynara cardunculus L. species, using both morphological and molecular markers. The combination of two stratification criteria with three sampling strategies allowed the establishment of six different core collections. The Maximization strategy was applied in order to obtain the seventh one. All the obtained collections were validated through phenotypic and molecular parameters, establishing as an initial criterion that the core collection should include, at most, 35-40 % of the accessions belonging to the original collection. All collections passed molecular validation; nevertheless morphological validation determined that the Proportional sampling strategy is the best to keep the initial variability while retaining the least number of accessions, especially when combined with the first stratification criterion. Although Maximization strategy allowed to preserve the original variability, it retained the largest number of accessions. In conclusion, the combination PrS1 (proportional sampling and first stratification criterion) is the best strategy to perform a representative core collection from a Cynara cardunculus L. initial collection, using both morphological and molecular data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AgriScientia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.31047/1668.298X.V36.N1.21904\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AgriScientia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298X.V36.N1.21904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriScientia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31047/1668.298X.V36.N1.21904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of different methodologies in order to perform a representative Cynara cardunculus L. core collection
his study was carried out in order to compare different methodologies to select a representative core collection from an initial collection of Cynara cardunculus L. species, using both morphological and molecular markers. The combination of two stratification criteria with three sampling strategies allowed the establishment of six different core collections. The Maximization strategy was applied in order to obtain the seventh one. All the obtained collections were validated through phenotypic and molecular parameters, establishing as an initial criterion that the core collection should include, at most, 35-40 % of the accessions belonging to the original collection. All collections passed molecular validation; nevertheless morphological validation determined that the Proportional sampling strategy is the best to keep the initial variability while retaining the least number of accessions, especially when combined with the first stratification criterion. Although Maximization strategy allowed to preserve the original variability, it retained the largest number of accessions. In conclusion, the combination PrS1 (proportional sampling and first stratification criterion) is the best strategy to perform a representative core collection from a Cynara cardunculus L. initial collection, using both morphological and molecular data.
AgriScientiaAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍:
AgriScientia es una revista de acceso abierto, de carácter científico-académico, gestionada por el Área de Difusión Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. La revista recibe artículos en los idiomas español e inglés. El objetivo de esta publicación es la difusión de los resultados de investigaciones de carácter agronómico. Está destinada a investigadores, estudiantes de pregrado, grado y posgrado, profesionales en el área de las ciencias agropecuarias y público en general interesado en las temáticas relacionadas. Su periodicidad es semestral. Los artículos se reciben durante todo el año. Los tipos de documentos que se publican son artículos científicos, comunicaciones y revisiones.