不同土壤覆盖下的水土流失评价

A. P. D. Silva, Emanoella Santos Carneiro, Lauriane De Oliveira Carneiro, Natielle Guimarães da Silva, Rosangela Leal Santos
{"title":"不同土壤覆盖下的水土流失评价","authors":"A. P. D. Silva, Emanoella Santos Carneiro, Lauriane De Oliveira Carneiro, Natielle Guimarães da Silva, Rosangela Leal Santos","doi":"10.13083/reveng.v30i1.15028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current hegemonic agricultural model, which is based on the green revolution, is intrinsically related to environmental and social impacts, such as erosion, desertification, and abandonment of agricultural areas. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the loss of soil and water through runoff during a simulated rainfall event, testing the efficiency of different types of coverings on beds with watermelon crops, inferring that in relation to soil loss, this was greater in uncovered soil. Therefore, it should be observed that this work has applicability in the choice of efficient soil management techniques, to minimize the effects of erosion and, consequently, the environmental impacts as a result of agricultural activities. The results obtained showed a loss equivalent to 72.72% of the total for bare soil, which means a greater sedimentation of the soil, while for soils covered with corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, a loss of 19.70% and 7.58% of the total were observed, respectively. Surface water runoff, with the use of corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, was reduced by 81.22% and 67.42%, respectively. It was concluded that soil cover is effective in controlling water erosion.The current hegemonic agricultural model, which is based on the green revolution, is intrinsically related to environmental and social impacts, such as erosion, desertification, and abandonment of agricultural areas. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the loss of soil and water through runoff during a simulated rainfall event, testing the efficiency of different types of coverings on beds with watermelon crops, inferring that in relation to soil loss, this was greater in uncovered soil. Therefore, it should be observed that this work has applicability in the choice of efficient soil management techniques, to minimize the effects of erosion and, consequently, the environmental impacts as a result of agricultural activities. The results obtained showed a loss equivalent to 72.72% of the total for bare soil, which means a greater sedimentation of the soil, while for soils covered with corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, a loss of 19.70% and 7.58% of the total were observed, respectively. Surface water runoff, with the use of corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, was reduced by 81.22% and 67.42%, respectively. It was concluded that soil cover is effective in controlling water erosion.","PeriodicalId":33461,"journal":{"name":"Engenharia na Agricultura","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of soil and water loss under different soil covers\",\"authors\":\"A. P. D. Silva, Emanoella Santos Carneiro, Lauriane De Oliveira Carneiro, Natielle Guimarães da Silva, Rosangela Leal Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.13083/reveng.v30i1.15028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current hegemonic agricultural model, which is based on the green revolution, is intrinsically related to environmental and social impacts, such as erosion, desertification, and abandonment of agricultural areas. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the loss of soil and water through runoff during a simulated rainfall event, testing the efficiency of different types of coverings on beds with watermelon crops, inferring that in relation to soil loss, this was greater in uncovered soil. Therefore, it should be observed that this work has applicability in the choice of efficient soil management techniques, to minimize the effects of erosion and, consequently, the environmental impacts as a result of agricultural activities. The results obtained showed a loss equivalent to 72.72% of the total for bare soil, which means a greater sedimentation of the soil, while for soils covered with corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, a loss of 19.70% and 7.58% of the total were observed, respectively. Surface water runoff, with the use of corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, was reduced by 81.22% and 67.42%, respectively. It was concluded that soil cover is effective in controlling water erosion.The current hegemonic agricultural model, which is based on the green revolution, is intrinsically related to environmental and social impacts, such as erosion, desertification, and abandonment of agricultural areas. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the loss of soil and water through runoff during a simulated rainfall event, testing the efficiency of different types of coverings on beds with watermelon crops, inferring that in relation to soil loss, this was greater in uncovered soil. Therefore, it should be observed that this work has applicability in the choice of efficient soil management techniques, to minimize the effects of erosion and, consequently, the environmental impacts as a result of agricultural activities. The results obtained showed a loss equivalent to 72.72% of the total for bare soil, which means a greater sedimentation of the soil, while for soils covered with corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, a loss of 19.70% and 7.58% of the total were observed, respectively. Surface water runoff, with the use of corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, was reduced by 81.22% and 67.42%, respectively. It was concluded that soil cover is effective in controlling water erosion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engenharia na Agricultura\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engenharia na Agricultura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13083/reveng.v30i1.15028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engenharia na Agricultura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13083/reveng.v30i1.15028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前以绿色革命为基础的霸权农业模式与环境和社会影响有着内在的联系,如水土流失、沙漠化和农业区的废弃。因此,本研究的目的是评估在模拟降雨事件中通过径流流失的土壤和水分,测试西瓜作物床上不同类型覆盖物的效率,推断与土壤流失有关,覆盖土壤的土壤流失更大。因此,应该指出,这项工作适用于选择有效的土壤管理技术,以尽量减少侵蚀的影响,从而减少农业活动对环境的影响。结果表明,裸土的土壤沉降量为72.72%,土壤沉降量较大;玉米秸秆覆盖和生物可降解地膜覆盖土壤的土壤沉降量分别为19.70%和7.58%。玉米秸秆和生物可降解地表水径流量分别减少81.22%和67.42%。结果表明,土壤覆盖在控制水土流失方面是有效的。当前以绿色革命为基础的霸权农业模式与环境和社会影响有着内在的联系,如水土流失、沙漠化和农业区的废弃。因此,本研究的目的是评估在模拟降雨事件中通过径流流失的土壤和水分,测试西瓜作物床上不同类型覆盖物的效率,推断与土壤流失有关,覆盖土壤的土壤流失更大。因此,应该指出,这项工作适用于选择有效的土壤管理技术,以尽量减少侵蚀的影响,从而减少农业活动对环境的影响。结果表明,裸土的土壤沉降量为72.72%,土壤沉降量较大;玉米秸秆覆盖和生物可降解地膜覆盖土壤的土壤沉降量分别为19.70%和7.58%。玉米秸秆和生物可降解地表水径流量分别减少81.22%和67.42%。结果表明,土壤覆盖在控制水土流失方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of soil and water loss under different soil covers
The current hegemonic agricultural model, which is based on the green revolution, is intrinsically related to environmental and social impacts, such as erosion, desertification, and abandonment of agricultural areas. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the loss of soil and water through runoff during a simulated rainfall event, testing the efficiency of different types of coverings on beds with watermelon crops, inferring that in relation to soil loss, this was greater in uncovered soil. Therefore, it should be observed that this work has applicability in the choice of efficient soil management techniques, to minimize the effects of erosion and, consequently, the environmental impacts as a result of agricultural activities. The results obtained showed a loss equivalent to 72.72% of the total for bare soil, which means a greater sedimentation of the soil, while for soils covered with corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, a loss of 19.70% and 7.58% of the total were observed, respectively. Surface water runoff, with the use of corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, was reduced by 81.22% and 67.42%, respectively. It was concluded that soil cover is effective in controlling water erosion.The current hegemonic agricultural model, which is based on the green revolution, is intrinsically related to environmental and social impacts, such as erosion, desertification, and abandonment of agricultural areas. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the loss of soil and water through runoff during a simulated rainfall event, testing the efficiency of different types of coverings on beds with watermelon crops, inferring that in relation to soil loss, this was greater in uncovered soil. Therefore, it should be observed that this work has applicability in the choice of efficient soil management techniques, to minimize the effects of erosion and, consequently, the environmental impacts as a result of agricultural activities. The results obtained showed a loss equivalent to 72.72% of the total for bare soil, which means a greater sedimentation of the soil, while for soils covered with corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, a loss of 19.70% and 7.58% of the total were observed, respectively. Surface water runoff, with the use of corn straw and the biodegradable blanket, was reduced by 81.22% and 67.42%, respectively. It was concluded that soil cover is effective in controlling water erosion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信