选择开挖土壤和岩石稳定剂的适用性图表(ESR)

IF 2.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yi Lu, E. Leong, Liang Zeng, Changhao Xu, Bingcheng Li
{"title":"选择开挖土壤和岩石稳定剂的适用性图表(ESR)","authors":"Yi Lu, E. Leong, Liang Zeng, Changhao Xu, Bingcheng Li","doi":"10.1080/19386362.2023.2182500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of the study is to develop charts to select the most suitable stabilizer (i.e. cement, lime and fly ash) for excavated soils and rocks (ESR) to improve their engineering behaviour. The suitability charts were developed based on considerations of soil gradation and plasticity. Data from the literature where cement, lime and fly ash (FA) were used to improve soil strength were collated. Based on the normalized unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the soils, zones of various degree of soil strength improvement for cement, lime and FA were identified. The suitability charts were validated using data from the literature not used in the development of the suitability charts. New data on kaolin and three ESRs from Guangzhou improved with cement, lime and FA. The suitability charts correctly indicated that lime is most suitable for kaolin while cement is most suitable for red soil and silty sand.","PeriodicalId":47238,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":"108 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suitability charts to select stabilizer for excavated soils and rocks (ESR)\",\"authors\":\"Yi Lu, E. Leong, Liang Zeng, Changhao Xu, Bingcheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19386362.2023.2182500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The aim of the study is to develop charts to select the most suitable stabilizer (i.e. cement, lime and fly ash) for excavated soils and rocks (ESR) to improve their engineering behaviour. The suitability charts were developed based on considerations of soil gradation and plasticity. Data from the literature where cement, lime and fly ash (FA) were used to improve soil strength were collated. Based on the normalized unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the soils, zones of various degree of soil strength improvement for cement, lime and FA were identified. The suitability charts were validated using data from the literature not used in the development of the suitability charts. New data on kaolin and three ESRs from Guangzhou improved with cement, lime and FA. The suitability charts correctly indicated that lime is most suitable for kaolin while cement is most suitable for red soil and silty sand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"108 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2023.2182500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2023.2182500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是制定图表,为开挖的土壤和岩石(ESR)选择最合适的稳定剂(即水泥、石灰和粉煤灰),以改善其工程性能。适宜性图表是在考虑土壤级配和塑性的基础上制定的。对文献中使用水泥、石灰和粉煤灰(FA)来提高土壤强度的数据进行了整理。基于土壤的归一化无侧限抗压强度(UCS),确定了水泥、石灰和FA对土壤强度有不同程度改善的区域。适用性图表使用未用于制定适用性图表的文献中的数据进行验证。用水泥、石灰和FA对广州高岭土和三种ESR的新数据进行了改进。适宜性图表正确地表明,石灰最适合高岭土,而水泥最适合红土和粉砂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suitability charts to select stabilizer for excavated soils and rocks (ESR)
ABSTRACT The aim of the study is to develop charts to select the most suitable stabilizer (i.e. cement, lime and fly ash) for excavated soils and rocks (ESR) to improve their engineering behaviour. The suitability charts were developed based on considerations of soil gradation and plasticity. Data from the literature where cement, lime and fly ash (FA) were used to improve soil strength were collated. Based on the normalized unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the soils, zones of various degree of soil strength improvement for cement, lime and FA were identified. The suitability charts were validated using data from the literature not used in the development of the suitability charts. New data on kaolin and three ESRs from Guangzhou improved with cement, lime and FA. The suitability charts correctly indicated that lime is most suitable for kaolin while cement is most suitable for red soil and silty sand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信