异性恋大学生对同性伴侣与异性伴侣养育子女行为的评价:实验对象间小插图设计研究

Q3 Social Sciences
Mateo Štrbić, Tomislav Jeleković, Dora Popović, M. Brajković, Petra Žukina, M. Štambuk
{"title":"异性恋大学生对同性伴侣与异性伴侣养育子女行为的评价:实验对象间小插图设计研究","authors":"Mateo Štrbić, Tomislav Jeleković, Dora Popović, M. Brajković, Petra Žukina, M. Štambuk","doi":"10.5613/rzs.49.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the decline in prejudice towards LGBT people, the issue of parenthood is still controversial with negative attitudes towards LGBT parents being openly expressed. This study aimed to examine attitudes towards parenting by same-sex couples using a vignette design. Parenting condition (parent’s negative vs positive reaction), active parent’s gender (mother vs father) and family composition (different-sex vs same-sex couple) were varied to test differences in the evaluations of parenting, child behaviour, family environment, social distance and willingness to grant rights. 392 heterosexual and cisgender students from the University of Zagreb (87% female, 13% male), aged 18 to 37, participated in an online study. After reading one of the eight vignettes, participants evaluated parenting, child behaviour, family environment, social distance and rights of the family described in the vignette. The results showed that parenting and family environment were evaluated as better, and participants were less convinced that the child’s behaviour is the result of parents’ relationship in the positive parenting condition than in the negative. Social distance was lower towards parents in the positive parenting condition than in the negative and – unexpectedly – towards same-sex in comparison to different-sex couples. Participants were more inclined to grant family rights to parents from the positive than to those from the negative parenting condition. Although other results suggested unbiased attitudes towards same-sex couples’ parenting, participants were less inclined to grant same-sex couples family rights in comparison to different-sex couples. The findings reflect an important mechanism underlying the stability of prejudice – a resistance towards generalising attitudes from individual cases to a group. This can be used in efforts to confront prejudice against parenting among LGBT people","PeriodicalId":39535,"journal":{"name":"Revija za Sociologiju","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5613/rzs.49.2.6","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluations of Parenting by Same-Sex vs Different-Sex Couples among Heterosexual University Students: Experimental Between-Subjects Vignette Design Study\",\"authors\":\"Mateo Štrbić, Tomislav Jeleković, Dora Popović, M. Brajković, Petra Žukina, M. Štambuk\",\"doi\":\"10.5613/rzs.49.2.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the decline in prejudice towards LGBT people, the issue of parenthood is still controversial with negative attitudes towards LGBT parents being openly expressed. This study aimed to examine attitudes towards parenting by same-sex couples using a vignette design. Parenting condition (parent’s negative vs positive reaction), active parent’s gender (mother vs father) and family composition (different-sex vs same-sex couple) were varied to test differences in the evaluations of parenting, child behaviour, family environment, social distance and willingness to grant rights. 392 heterosexual and cisgender students from the University of Zagreb (87% female, 13% male), aged 18 to 37, participated in an online study. After reading one of the eight vignettes, participants evaluated parenting, child behaviour, family environment, social distance and rights of the family described in the vignette. The results showed that parenting and family environment were evaluated as better, and participants were less convinced that the child’s behaviour is the result of parents’ relationship in the positive parenting condition than in the negative. Social distance was lower towards parents in the positive parenting condition than in the negative and – unexpectedly – towards same-sex in comparison to different-sex couples. Participants were more inclined to grant family rights to parents from the positive than to those from the negative parenting condition. Although other results suggested unbiased attitudes towards same-sex couples’ parenting, participants were less inclined to grant same-sex couples family rights in comparison to different-sex couples. The findings reflect an important mechanism underlying the stability of prejudice – a resistance towards generalising attitudes from individual cases to a group. This can be used in efforts to confront prejudice against parenting among LGBT people\",\"PeriodicalId\":39535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revija za Sociologiju\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5613/rzs.49.2.6\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revija za Sociologiju\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.49.2.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija za Sociologiju","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5613/rzs.49.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

尽管对LGBT人群的偏见有所减少,但为人父母的问题仍然存在争议,人们公开表达了对LGBT父母的负面态度。本研究旨在通过小插图的设计来检验同性伴侣对养育子女的态度。通过改变父母的教养条件(父母的消极反应与积极反应)、主动父母的性别(母亲与父亲)和家庭组成(异性与同性伴侣)来测试对父母教养、儿童行为、家庭环境、社会距离和授予权利意愿的评价差异。来自萨格勒布大学(University of Zagreb)的392名异性恋和异性恋学生(87%为女性,13%为男性)参加了一项在线研究,年龄在18至37岁之间。在阅读了八个小短文中的一个后,参与者评估了小短文中描述的育儿、孩子行为、家庭环境、社会距离和家庭权利。结果表明,父母教养和家庭环境的评价更好,参与者不太相信孩子的行为是父母关系的结果,在积极的父母教养条件下比在消极的父母教养条件下。与异性伴侣相比,在积极父母教养条件下,与父母的社会距离比在消极父母教养条件下更低,出乎意料的是,与同性伴侣相比,与同性伴侣的社会距离更低。参与者更倾向于给予父母积极的家庭权利,而不是消极的父母。尽管其他结果表明,人们对同性伴侣养育子女的态度是公正的,但与异性伴侣相比,参与者更不倾向于给予同性伴侣家庭权利。这些发现反映了偏见稳定性背后的一个重要机制——一种对从个体到群体的概括态度的抵制。这可以用来对抗LGBT人群对养育子女的偏见
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluations of Parenting by Same-Sex vs Different-Sex Couples among Heterosexual University Students: Experimental Between-Subjects Vignette Design Study
Despite the decline in prejudice towards LGBT people, the issue of parenthood is still controversial with negative attitudes towards LGBT parents being openly expressed. This study aimed to examine attitudes towards parenting by same-sex couples using a vignette design. Parenting condition (parent’s negative vs positive reaction), active parent’s gender (mother vs father) and family composition (different-sex vs same-sex couple) were varied to test differences in the evaluations of parenting, child behaviour, family environment, social distance and willingness to grant rights. 392 heterosexual and cisgender students from the University of Zagreb (87% female, 13% male), aged 18 to 37, participated in an online study. After reading one of the eight vignettes, participants evaluated parenting, child behaviour, family environment, social distance and rights of the family described in the vignette. The results showed that parenting and family environment were evaluated as better, and participants were less convinced that the child’s behaviour is the result of parents’ relationship in the positive parenting condition than in the negative. Social distance was lower towards parents in the positive parenting condition than in the negative and – unexpectedly – towards same-sex in comparison to different-sex couples. Participants were more inclined to grant family rights to parents from the positive than to those from the negative parenting condition. Although other results suggested unbiased attitudes towards same-sex couples’ parenting, participants were less inclined to grant same-sex couples family rights in comparison to different-sex couples. The findings reflect an important mechanism underlying the stability of prejudice – a resistance towards generalising attitudes from individual cases to a group. This can be used in efforts to confront prejudice against parenting among LGBT people
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revija za Sociologiju
Revija za Sociologiju Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信