边界对旅游业有多重要？欧洲的情况

IF 3.6 3区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

Tourism Economics Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1177/13548166221132452

Federico Carril-Caccia, J. M. Martín Martín, F. J. Sáez-Fernández

{"title":"边界对旅游业有多重要？欧洲的情况","authors":"Federico Carril-Caccia, J. M. Martín Martín, F. J. Sáez-Fernández","doi":"10.1177/13548166221132452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a bilateral dataset of trips for 32 European countries for the period 2012–2019, we aim to gauge the size and evolution of the border effect on tourism: the extent to which domestic tourism is greater (or lesser) than international tourism. We found that the tourism flow within countries was 24 times greater than between countries. Also, we show that, relative to 2012, the border effect diminished by 13% in 2019. Our results suggest that the size (and evolution) of the border effect is the same for trips that last between one and three nights (short trips) and those that last four nights or more (long trips). Nonetheless, our findings show that bilateral determinants that represent travel and transaction costs are more important when explaining short trips than long ones.","PeriodicalId":23204,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How important are borders for tourism? The case of Europe\",\"authors\":\"Federico Carril-Caccia, J. M. Martín Martín, F. J. Sáez-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13548166221132452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a bilateral dataset of trips for 32 European countries for the period 2012–2019, we aim to gauge the size and evolution of the border effect on tourism: the extent to which domestic tourism is greater (or lesser) than international tourism. We found that the tourism flow within countries was 24 times greater than between countries. Also, we show that, relative to 2012, the border effect diminished by 13% in 2019. Our results suggest that the size (and evolution) of the border effect is the same for trips that last between one and three nights (short trips) and those that last four nights or more (long trips). Nonetheless, our findings show that bilateral determinants that represent travel and transaction costs are more important when explaining short trips than long ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tourism Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tourism Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166221132452\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166221132452","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

利用2012-2019年期间32个欧洲国家的双边旅行数据集，我们旨在衡量边境对旅游业影响的大小和演变：国内旅游业比国际旅游业大（或小）的程度。我们发现，国家内部的旅游流量是国家之间的24倍。此外，我们还表明，与2012年相比，2019年边境效应减少了13%。我们的研究结果表明，持续一到三个晚上的旅行（短途旅行）和持续四个晚上或更长时间的旅行（长途旅行），边界效应的大小（和演变）是相同的。尽管如此，我们的研究结果表明，在解释短途旅行时，代表旅行和交易成本的双边决定因素比长途旅行更重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How important are borders for tourism? The case of Europe

Using a bilateral dataset of trips for 32 European countries for the period 2012–2019, we aim to gauge the size and evolution of the border effect on tourism: the extent to which domestic tourism is greater (or lesser) than international tourism. We found that the tourism flow within countries was 24 times greater than between countries. Also, we show that, relative to 2012, the border effect diminished by 13% in 2019. Our results suggest that the size (and evolution) of the border effect is the same for trips that last between one and three nights (short trips) and those that last four nights or more (long trips). Nonetheless, our findings show that bilateral determinants that represent travel and transaction costs are more important when explaining short trips than long ones.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tourism Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

9.30

自引率

11.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Tourism Economics, published quarterly, covers the business aspects of tourism in the wider context. It takes account of constraints on development, such as social and community interests and the sustainable use of tourism and recreation resources, and inputs into the production process. The definition of tourism used includes tourist trips taken for all purposes, embracing both stay and day visitors. Articles address the components of the tourism product (accommodation; restaurants; merchandizing; attractions; transport; entertainment; tourist activities); and the economic organization of tourism at micro and macro levels (market structure; role of public/private sectors; community interests; strategic planning; marketing; finance; economic development).