公众和患者参与衰老和痴呆研究

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
J. Ashton, C. Aldus, P. Richmond, H. Allen
{"title":"公众和患者参与衰老和痴呆研究","authors":"J. Ashton, C. Aldus, P. Richmond, H. Allen","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to assess the current state, and various methods, of public and patient involvement, particularly but not exclusively in research on ageing and dementia. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were carried out with a researcher, who has had a leading role in research on dementia; a public contributor with extensive relevant experience; and a member of the research design service with responsibility for patient and public involvement. Findings All those involved in the research can benefit considerably from public and patient involvement and it can make a significant difference to the course of a project. The importance of choosing an appropriate method of involvement is discussed and planning for it in both financial terms and time allowed. Examples are given of successful studies. Research limitations/implications Those who took part in the interviews were chosen for their record in furthering public and patient involvement in research. There is no attempt to compare their views with those of the wider research community. Practical implications The various ways in which patients and the public are involved in relevant research is a guide to those designing projects and those who may want to explore opportunities for involvement. Social implications Social implications include being able to influence research projects, contributors of all ages find they are valued. Originality/value The format of the paper is original, eliciting material from three viewpoints on research and involvement.","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"259-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public and patient involvement in research on ageing and dementia\",\"authors\":\"J. Ashton, C. Aldus, P. Richmond, H. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This paper aims to assess the current state, and various methods, of public and patient involvement, particularly but not exclusively in research on ageing and dementia. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were carried out with a researcher, who has had a leading role in research on dementia; a public contributor with extensive relevant experience; and a member of the research design service with responsibility for patient and public involvement. Findings All those involved in the research can benefit considerably from public and patient involvement and it can make a significant difference to the course of a project. The importance of choosing an appropriate method of involvement is discussed and planning for it in both financial terms and time allowed. Examples are given of successful studies. Research limitations/implications Those who took part in the interviews were chosen for their record in furthering public and patient involvement in research. There is no attempt to compare their views with those of the wider research community. Practical implications The various ways in which patients and the public are involved in relevant research is a guide to those designing projects and those who may want to explore opportunities for involvement. Social implications Social implications include being able to influence research projects, contributors of all ages find they are valued. Originality/value The format of the paper is original, eliciting material from three viewpoints on research and involvement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"259-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0064\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在评估公众和患者参与的现状和各种方法,特别是但不限于衰老和痴呆症的研究。设计/方法/方法与一名在痴呆症研究中起主导作用的研究人员进行了访谈;具有丰富相关经验的公众贡献者;也是研究设计服务的一员,负责病人和公众的参与。所有参与研究的人都可以从公众和患者的参与中受益匪浅,这对项目的进程有很大的影响。讨论了选择适当的参与方法的重要性,并在财务和时间允许的情况下进行了规划。文中还列举了一些成功的研究实例。研究的局限性/意义选择参与访谈的人是根据他们在促进公众和患者参与研究方面的记录。没有人试图将他们的观点与更广泛的研究界的观点进行比较。实际意义患者和公众参与相关研究的各种方式对那些设计项目的人和那些可能想要探索参与机会的人来说是一个指南。社会影响社会影响包括能够影响研究项目,所有年龄段的贡献者都发现他们受到重视。原创性/价值论文的格式是原创的,从研究和参与的三个角度引出材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public and patient involvement in research on ageing and dementia
Purpose This paper aims to assess the current state, and various methods, of public and patient involvement, particularly but not exclusively in research on ageing and dementia. Design/methodology/approach Interviews were carried out with a researcher, who has had a leading role in research on dementia; a public contributor with extensive relevant experience; and a member of the research design service with responsibility for patient and public involvement. Findings All those involved in the research can benefit considerably from public and patient involvement and it can make a significant difference to the course of a project. The importance of choosing an appropriate method of involvement is discussed and planning for it in both financial terms and time allowed. Examples are given of successful studies. Research limitations/implications Those who took part in the interviews were chosen for their record in furthering public and patient involvement in research. There is no attempt to compare their views with those of the wider research community. Practical implications The various ways in which patients and the public are involved in relevant research is a guide to those designing projects and those who may want to explore opportunities for involvement. Social implications Social implications include being able to influence research projects, contributors of all ages find they are valued. Originality/value The format of the paper is original, eliciting material from three viewpoints on research and involvement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信